To: treetopsandroofs
So a 200-lb person on earth would weigh 720 pounds there, and its parent star is 7 times as far away as the NEXT nearest star to earth.The weight is also dependent on radius. If this place has double the radius as earth, his weight is only 180 pounds.
How is all this holding up regarding the "Drake Equation" which esimated the frequency of habitable plants?
10 posted on
09/12/2011 3:00:25 PM PDT by
cicero2k
To: cicero2k
I just noticed your post. I wouldn’t have bothered with my #13, if I had seen yours first. With the way FR is acting today (very slow for me), I got distracted for a few minutes, in the middle of posting, and didn’t know that you had alredy posted essentially the same point.
To: cicero2k
The weight is also dependent on radius.This explains Michael Moore's "draw."
24 posted on
09/12/2011 3:36:10 PM PDT by
the invisib1e hand
(...then they came for the guitars, and we kicked their sorry faggot asses into the dust)
To: cicero2k
39 posted on
09/12/2011 7:56:33 PM PDT by
Balding_Eagle
(Overproduction, one of the top five worries of the American Farmer each and every year..)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson