Posted on 09/13/2011 8:22:23 AM PDT by IMissPresidentReagan
if you already have the strain of hpv that gardasil protects against, it won't cure you
in its simplest form, a vaccine is just a dead virus - your body can't tell if a virus is alive or dead - it causes your body to make antibodies to kill it
A caller said drug is NOT effective after a child has sex.
Rush said, “Well then, what age would that be? 7 or 8?
Rush later said that caller’s assertion needs to be checked out because Rush is getting conflicting info on caller’s assertion. He does not know if that is true.
Someone from Texas is now telling me I was looking at an old form. That is possible. It still leaves the expense, six month wait, and the whims of a bureaucrat all that stood between the mandate and your child. What if you moved to Texas?
Far be it from me to be the defender of anyone; but a couple of things. By 2007, her daughters would have been beyond the age impacted (although the youngest one is 17 I believe.)
Also did she write, or vote for the bill..... It would seem that would be more TPaw’s problem than her’s, in fairness.
Michele Bachmann was elected to the House in Nov. of 2006. When this legislation was being passed by the Minnesota legislature, she was no longer a member of that body.
I do not think she has a "problem".
Re Gardisil I thought the caller’s point that Texas requires vaccinations for sexually transmitted diseases like Hepatitis B, I forget the other one she said, why can’t they require others? And Perry’s point they only contributed $5,000 to his campaign was interesting.
So what if they were old forms, wouldn’t that have been what Perry originally ordered?
“Id also recommend to Rush that he sit down with Sarah Palin so she can adequately explain Crony Capitalism to him. Im a bit disappointed in him today, he seems to be quite uninformed on much of this Bachmann/Palin/Perry Gardisil topic.”
~~~~~~~~~`
I agree. Did not PALIN say that one of Perry’s chief staff members went to work for Merck AFTER she left her govt job and BEFORE Perry made his Gardisil decision-—i.e., Palin was implying that that fact alone is a conflict of interest and falls within her definition of crony capitalism.
Is that what you understood?
Meanwhile, it looks like just the direct funds Perry raised from Merck were in the hundreds of thousands, not a mere $5K:
???
Sarah Palins Alaska Took Federal Funds to Increase Access to Gardasil
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2777712/posts
Delving a little further into this, Bachmann was not in the State Senate at the time of this legislation.
The contention is that the forms were changed before the order. I could have sworn I checked the date, but I am backing down on this claim until I can do the research again.
That was the Republican Governors Association right?
That’s all voluntary, no mandate.
If you’ll look into the thread, she did not mandate it and likely did not even ask for the funds as it hit six months into her term. Have you ever known the Feds to act that quickly on something?
Yeah, a good chunk of it, though we already know how he had used the RGA to launder a million-dollar contribution even before he headed it up.
Sorry for jumping the gun. Just trying to get all info out there that may be used as ammo by other campaigns.
“launder”?
Oh look, Perry’s also had his former chief of staff form a PAC to back him (with $55M) that can take unlimited donations and is shielded from revealing donors.
No wonder Perry found the idea of selling out for $5K so insulting!
No problem.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.