Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: milagro

Very good insight and analysis. I like Bachman, Santorum, Cain, Gingrich etc.. so I’m not going to tear them down. The only ones I would really lay into on that stage are Huntsman and Romney (the RINOS) and Paul (the moonbat). I will say one thing about Ron Paul. He was right on when he talked about executive orders. He said that he would use them but not for legislative reasons. That is the correct and constitutional answer. BTW, is there a more dour candidate than Ron Paul? I mean, the guy never cracks a smile. What was his bedside manner like as a physician? It must have been horrible!!


75 posted on 09/13/2011 10:43:55 AM PDT by Old Teufel Hunden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies ]


To: Old Teufel Hunden
Thanks! Ron Paul has some great insights--but also some HUGE blindspots, as was shown by his comments on 9/11--which weirdly echoed those of Bill Ayers' editorial after 9/11/2001. Huntsman's support of Globull Warming is scary--and I'm not sure he's a true conservative.

I LOVE Cain--maybe he'd be a great VP pick (that would get the lib race-baiters all wee-weed up for sure). Or even Palin--but the position I'd LOVE to see Palin hold is Secretary of the Interior. That would for sure produce some major Lib wee-wee!

83 posted on 09/13/2011 10:56:23 AM PDT by milagro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson