plenty of freepers including some potent (and literary)ones and most GOP pundits are either ignorant of the truth of that era or willfully ignore how times actually were and parse a PC on race view
Beck and Hannity are worst offenders of folks we think of as conservative..all the Neos talk the party line stuff...Coulter, Will, WSJ folks, and so forth
Rush next..and I like Rush and know he knows better but he got McNabbed publicly and has Snerdly staring him in the face..so..there u are
then Levin...another one I like to he goes anti Southern on me...sometimes I think Levin wants to be frank but his Republicanism holds him back
only Savage actually calls it like it was on that 60s race legislation and notable figures from then
did I leave anyone out?
You pretty much have to go to sites not welcome here to get a realspeak view of CRA, VRA and so forth that many glowingly attribute as GOP “successes” blussfully ignorant that those acts killed American culture..likely forver
Most folks who post here would never figure Reagan, Buckley and Goldwater agreed more with John Stennis or Strom Thurmond back then than they did many of their fellow GOP folks...
Rush didn't get McNabbed. If anything he got Palined. His words were taken out of context just like Sarah Palin's when she exhorted The Tea Party audience she was addressing to "party like it's 1773".
Rush was criticizing sports writers and talking heads, not McNabb.
As for the Snerdly thing. What does that even mean, "there u are"?
Why are you and Michael Savage so jealous of Rush's and Sean "Wallbanger" Hannity's success? What difference does it make that Hannity used to be a contractor?
Oh, by the way, Savage's real last name is Weiner.
But, then, I guess if you're going to attack others on baseless grounds, it sounds more manly to call yourself Savage than Weiner.