Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Texas Eagle

“So-o-o-o....why didn’t Goldwater run as a DemocRAT?”

Because he was a Republican.

A western Republican who had more in common with the conservative southern Democrats of the 1960s than he did with the liberal eastern establishment Republicans who dominated the GOP and who worked actively to defeat him.


34 posted on 10/10/2011 8:17:48 AM PDT by Pelham (Immigrating America into just one more Latin American country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]


To: Pelham
Me: “So-o-o-o....why didn’t Goldwater run as a DemocRAT?”

You:Because he was a Republican.

LOL! Oh.

You: A western Republican who had more in common with the conservative southern Democrats of the 1960s than he did with the liberal eastern establishment Republicans who dominated the GOP and who worked actively to defeat him.

If he had more in common with the Conservative southern DemocRATS than he did with the Liberal eastern Establishment Republicans, why was he a Republican at all? Who was the Southern Conservative dominated RAT candidate in 1964? If memory serves it was a Conservative (by your logic) Southerner named Lyndon Baines Johnson. The man who gave us The Great Society, The War On Poverty, and other government-expanding programs that have only served to shackle blacks in dependency and substandard living conditions for decades.

Further, if the Eastern Establishment Republicans dominated the GOP, how did he become the Republican nominee for President?

Your argument simply makes no sense.

40 posted on 10/10/2011 10:52:00 AM PDT by Texas Eagle (If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all -- Texas Eagle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson