Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pelosi: Unemployment would be 15% if not for us.
Townhall.com ^ | November 7, 2011 | Bob Beauprez

Posted on 11/07/2011 8:25:47 AM PST by Kaslin

Nancy Pelosi stepped in front of the cameras to defend Barack Obama and the Democrats' record on job creation and the economy recently.  The former Speaker of the House said the President had been "a job creator from day one."  As if that statement alone didn't sufficiently prove her detachment from reality, she added that "if President Obama and House Congressional Democrats had not acted, we would be at 15 percent unemployment."  (video here)

Nancy should have left the numbers to somebody who actually understands them, because a little analysis of the real tragic situation in the workforce reveals that the total number of unemployed in America is much closer to 15 percent than the former Speaker apparently realizes, and there is plenty more bad news, too.

It is true that according to the Labor Department's October 2011 report, 13.9 million Americans are unemployed by definition.  However, that definition and calculation does not include the 6.57 million who have given up even trying to find a job, and are not considered as part of the total labor force.  When both groups are included, a more accurate unemployment rate of about 13 percent results.

As the following chart demonstrates, the size of the working age population has increased almost 6.5 million since Obama took office.  However, the total labor force has remained essentially unchanged.   

In addition, for all the talk of jobs saved-or-created by Obama and the Democrats, the numbers tell a different story; nearly 2 million fewer people even have a job than when the President took office, and again, the available workforce is larger by 6.5 million.

A critical ratio in the above numbers is what the Labor Department calls the Participation Rate; the number of people employed or looking for work out of the total age-eligible population.  Throughout the last decade, the Labor Department's statistics indicate that ratio held near or above 66%.  The Participation Rate was 65.8% when Obama took office with the effects of the recession already being felt.  The stark reality of this ratio means that about 4 million Americans who would normally be bringing home a pay check and adding to the total productivity of the nation are on the sidelines.

A decline during a recession is expected, but the real fault with Obama and the Democrats lies in the inability to restore economic confidence such that jobs are once again available and Americans re-enter the work force.  Not since the recession of the early 1980s when America was recovering from the Carter Administration's inept policies has the Participation Rate been so low. 

Perhaps the most ignored statistical tragedy of Obama's failed economic policies is found in the Labor Department's tracking of people working "part time for economic reasons."  Included in this category are people who want full-time jobs, but either have been cut back on hours or can't find full-time employment.  These are the millions of Americans bringing home a piece of a paycheck instead of all that they'd like to provide for their family. 

Again, it is totally normal that this number would increase at the start of a recession.  However, as the following BLS chart shows, during the last decade slightly more than 4 million Americans were typically in this part-time employed category.  That number more than doubled as the recession hit in 2008, but it has remained stuck at around 9 million for three years with recent months actually indicating an increasing trend yet again.

Number part time employed for economic reasons

Obama and Pelosi were the ones who promised upon passage of their ill-conceived $800 billion economic Stimulus in January 2009 that unemployment would stay below 8 percent.  However, the unemployment rate blew past that self-imposed threshold the very next month and has never been close to that level since.  Now, we are told to forget those earlier promises and projections and find satisfaction in their claim that if not for them, it might have been even worse.  

Clearly, the economic policies that Barack Obama and Nancy Pelosi promised would pull America out of recession haven't worked, and all they have to offer is more government, more spending, and an insulting salvo that "it could have been worse" if not for them. 

We're reminded of 1980 when another Democrat administration proved completely inept in dealing with a struggling economy and had lost all credibility with the voters.  The Republican candidate for President explained that, "A recession is when your neighbor loses his job.  A depression is when you lose yours.  And, a recovery is when Jimmy Carter loses his."   Ronald Reagan won that election and put in place policies that led to three decades of tremendous job creation and economic growth.  Most importantly Reagan sparked a renewed sense of optimism and confidence in American Exceptionalism.  The best cure for our struggling economy is not more-of-the-same from Obama; it is Election Day 2012.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Editorial
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-54 next last

1 posted on 11/07/2011 8:25:47 AM PST by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Not one of the GOP has the gonads to tell We The People the truth and expose RAT lies!


2 posted on 11/07/2011 8:28:59 AM PST by ExTexasRedhead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

That wretched hag needs meds STAT! Talk about useful idiots. What does she take us to be? As stupid as the progressives that follow this cr@p in lock step. Pelosi your last botox injection punctured your last brain cell and you need to retire to the barn.


3 posted on 11/07/2011 8:29:26 AM PST by Bitsy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

The galactic overlord would have landed and enslaved us if not for Pelosi. Prove me wrong.


4 posted on 11/07/2011 8:29:31 AM PST by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

More like unemployment would be 5% if it were not for you.


5 posted on 11/07/2011 8:30:50 AM PST by US_MilitaryRules (Uhhhh!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
"Unemployment would be 15% if not for us."

What Natzi Puh-losi left out...Unemployment would be 15% if not for (REPUBLICANS STANDING UP TO) us.

6 posted on 11/07/2011 8:30:50 AM PST by RasterMaster ("To sin by silence when they should protest makes cowards of men." - Abraham Lincoln)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

And the national debt would be $25,000,000,000,000. Tell us more fairy tales.


7 posted on 11/07/2011 8:31:14 AM PST by luvbach1 (Stop the destruction in 2012 or continue the decline)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
I challenge Ms Pelosi to PROVE it with statistics. Is she using the jobs saved again? Bush could have used that "...except for what we did" in all sorts of situations, including Iraq. "Saddam would have had a nuke if it weren't for us"
8 posted on 11/07/2011 8:31:17 AM PST by Cheerio (Barry Hussein Soetoro-0bama=The Complete Destruction of American Capitalism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DManA

She must have asked her “mirror mirror on the wall” for that information.


9 posted on 11/07/2011 8:31:45 AM PST by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter knows whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

It IS 15%.


10 posted on 11/07/2011 8:33:02 AM PST by RexBeach (There is no such thing as a good tax - Winston Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bitsy
I get the fact that when a political party has the WH when things are bad, the rest of the party tries to put a positive spin on a bad situation.

But spin is different than disconnected from reality. Pelosi is long gone connected from reality

11 posted on 11/07/2011 8:33:28 AM PST by LMAO ("Begging hands and Bleeding hearts will only cry out for more"...Anthem from Rush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: DManA

Beyond her ‘eye work’; we know Nancy gets a ‘nose job’, every year. If she didn’t; she would be tripping over it, by now.


12 posted on 11/07/2011 8:33:54 AM PST by cricket (Stop the madness. . . Vote the KING out!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Pelosi: Unemployment would be 15% if not for us.

Instead, thanks to Nancy and friends, unemployment is 16%.....


13 posted on 11/07/2011 8:34:04 AM PST by Iron Munro (One Trillion seconds = 31,709 years. One Trillion dollars = 3 Months of Obama Spending)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

I thought they said it would not go up to 8%?

(it was 4% when Bush 2 was president, and only went to 6% when Pelosi took over as speaker)


14 posted on 11/07/2011 8:37:34 AM PST by Mr. K (The enemy of my enemy is my candidate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Time for mandatory drug testing of elected officials.


15 posted on 11/07/2011 8:39:22 AM PST by hometoroost (Frodo lives!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

In the Democrat playbook politics is about telling the biggest lie they can get people to believe.


16 posted on 11/07/2011 8:41:59 AM PST by A message
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

This kind of crap is why I want a Law that isues penalties and Jail time for any Gov. employee that LIES to the American People.

BTW, I heard one of the Fox business guys say that in the Obamacare bill, the suppose Government picking up the tab for any cost overage on policies, doesn’t include family policies.

That only the policy purchaser would get an individual bene.

The family cost would not be reimburse. AND the STATES are saying they can’t handle the cost .

Like I said: There needs to be a felony Law for LYING to American People.


17 posted on 11/07/2011 8:42:29 AM PST by marty60
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Pelosi: Unemployment would be 15% if not for us.
____________________________________________

We got it up to 25%

arent we great ???


18 posted on 11/07/2011 8:43:30 AM PST by Tennessee Nana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

More democrat numbers pick one anyone will do.


19 posted on 11/07/2011 8:43:35 AM PST by Vaduz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

I love these fairytale “If not for us” claims!

We can use them too!

If not for George Bush II we would have been in a nuclear war with Saddam Hussein~!

Wow, that’s fun and easy! So much more so than actual facts


20 posted on 11/07/2011 8:44:17 AM PST by Mr. K (The enemy of my enemy is my candidate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-54 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson