Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Now that the truth is out about the 'HISTORIC WIN' for Romney does it matter?

You bet it does but it also shows that Iowa was in the tank for Romney and STILL is because they claim it is NOW a tie between Romney and Santorum...a TIE?

Well why do they say it is NOW a tie because there some precincts that will never be counted when the same facts existed when they claimed Romney was called the winner by just eight votes?

1 posted on 01/19/2012 4:56:23 AM PST by RetSignman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last
To: RetSignman

No one cares.

This script was written a year ago.


39 posted on 01/19/2012 5:53:59 AM PST by Jim Noble ("The Germans: At your feet, or at your throat" - Winston Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RetSignman

So, Santorum’s delegate count from Iowa increases from 0 to 0.


42 posted on 01/19/2012 6:04:16 AM PST by Happy Valley Dude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RetSignman

Romney by 8 = WIN
Santorum by 34 = TIE

Got it!


43 posted on 01/19/2012 6:04:40 AM PST by Lady Lucky (A tea party in name only is worse than no tea party at all.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RetSignman

Chip Saltsman spokes person in Iowa...’Mitt has already sucked up all the gravy in Iowa’.

So he doesn’t matter? Has he ever heard of vomiting and gravy is so easy to throw up.


44 posted on 01/19/2012 6:05:28 AM PST by RetSignman (I take responsibility for what I post not for what you understand.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RetSignman

Wow - if Denver had just gotten one more point they would’ve tied New England


48 posted on 01/19/2012 6:12:11 AM PST by nomobs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RetSignman

Beck will be in a total mild down mode today.


49 posted on 01/19/2012 6:13:46 AM PST by RetSignman (I take responsibility for what I post not for what you understand.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RetSignman

this only further convinces me that the fix is in.

Sickening.


52 posted on 01/19/2012 6:31:22 AM PST by a real Sheila (Taylor/Fife 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RetSignman

When they declared for mitt the twit it was historic; when Santorum wins in the real count it’s a tie. Several boxes of ballots are missing and may never be found. It sounds very much like the Iowa GOP is ineptly trying to put in the “fix” like the democrat party does everywhere. Why again is it that we let a few states pick our candidates? We wail and moan about the MSM and democrat party picking our candidates but we don’t seem to mind when the GOP elite in a few states do it. We are again back to either SC or FL making the choice for all of the rest of us so why bother with any other primaries. What a pile of crap.


55 posted on 01/19/2012 6:53:45 AM PST by RJS1950 (The democrats are the "enemies foreign and domestic" cited in the federal oath)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All

Wow...I predict MASSIVE voter fraud this November. Sure win for Obama.


56 posted on 01/19/2012 6:59:18 AM PST by Fawn (NEWT! NEWT! NEWT! NEWT! NEWT! NEWT!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RetSignman
The Des Moines Register has a fair amount of detail and is mostly practicing journalism here.

They link to a spreadsheet with the precinct breakdown for the 1766 precincts they were able to certify. That spreadsheet verified my surmise that whatever the votes were in the other 8 non-certified precincts, they are not being counted. They're not even lines on the spreadsheet. Hopefully someone will perform further journalism and discover what went wrong. As of this posting the Iowa GOP site hasn't been updated today; the Register is the only site with data posted.

I don't have time for a full comparison now, but a glance at the "certified" spread sheet in comparison to the one posted after "Mitt won" revealed a couple interesting points.

First, they broke down the voting by others in more detail. Sarah Palin only received 23 votes statewide. Cain received 45. Some much for their hopes of resurrection.

Second, although they aren't providing totals from the 8 "non-certified" precincts now, their unofficial results were provided earlier this month and if unchanged would provide Santorum with an additional 35 vote margin:

46 Romney
81 Santorum
64 Paul
30 Gingrich
31 Perry
15 Bachman
2 Huntsman
269 Total

So although they are now saying Santorum 'won' in the 99.5% complete 'final' tally, had it been 100% the best available data suggests he really won by about 69 votes. The size and trend of those 8 unofficially counted precincts makes it fairly likely that Santorum really did win Iowa.

So we're off to an interesting day. Santorum flips Mitt in Iowa. Perry reported to be dropping out. Newt gets dropped on by ex #2 tonight and what will likely be an interesting debate tonight. I'm off to work so will be offline awhile.

58 posted on 01/19/2012 7:18:35 AM PST by JohnBovenmyer (Obama been Liberal. Hope Change!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson