Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: PreciousLiberty
I also think the USAF will eventually have to bite the bullet and move towards a common hardware configuration that enables all F-22 capabilities for the entire fleet

Which will probably happen, but not for another decade at least.

What could have been done, and IMHO should have been done, is if we were going to settle on 187 as the final number, then we build 187 aircraft to the newest hardware and wiring standard, and sell off the earlier block aircraft to allies who wanted F-22s such as Japan and Australia.

17 posted on 02/29/2012 8:42:03 AM PST by Yo-Yo (Is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]


To: Yo-Yo

“What could have been done, and IMHO should have been done, is if we were going to settle on 187 as the final number, then we build 187 aircraft to the newest hardware and wiring standard, and sell off the earlier block aircraft to allies who wanted F-22s such as Japan and Australia. “

I’m in full agreement!


20 posted on 02/29/2012 9:33:18 AM PST by PreciousLiberty (Real Hope - Santorum '12!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: Yo-Yo

“What could have been done, and IMHO should have been done, is if we were going to settle on 187 as the final number, then we build 187 aircraft to the newest hardware and wiring standard, and sell off the earlier block aircraft to allies who wanted F-22s such as Japan and Australia. “

I’m in full agreement!


21 posted on 02/29/2012 9:33:31 AM PST by PreciousLiberty (Real Hope - Santorum '12!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson