Help me out, please. Why is Rick’s an “Historic Presidential Campaign”? Just asking.
He did the campaign on a wing and a prayer. A classic underdog. If he had had the headline victory in Iowa, and had won in SC, he would have been Romney’s chief rival.
Based on some stats I saw a couple of months back, I would be willing to bet that when all the figures are tallied, Rick's campaign will show a better $ to vote ratio than virtually any other primary campaign in modern history. That's not an altogether insignificant stat. While the cynics will say it demonstrates an inability for Rick to raise money, future underfunded campaigns, especially those going up against well funded opponents will study many of the positive aspects of the managment of Rick's campaign, as well as the mistakes he made.
I agree. Why is Santorum’s campaign “historic”?