Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: PA Engineer
Maybe you missed my previous post. The point is that he could have avoided the appearance of impropriety had he just made it clear to the official, verbally, that he wasn't the person in question.

The point I was making in the post you responded to is that the very act of offering the ballot is enough for O'Keefe to demonstrate that ID is required.

48 posted on 04/11/2012 1:23:21 AM PDT by csense
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]


To: csense
The point I was making in the post you responded to is that the very act of offering the ballot is enough for O'Keefe to demonstrate that ID is required.

You missed the main point. No ID is required by law. Period.
49 posted on 04/11/2012 1:33:48 AM PDT by PA Engineer (Time to beat the swords of government tyranny into the plowshares of freedom.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson