So is it for the children anymore?.../s Yeah I know it never was
But I thought all liberalism was all for the children...
Seems to me that providing ineffective education to children would be a greater attack on ‘human rights’.
In the REAL WORLD:
MY BOSS:
Attempts to remove ineffective employees is an attack directed at increasing efficiency,providing outstanding customer service and increasing sales leading to larger pay increases for all of us.
Clearing the forest of dead debris makes the forest grow healthier.
Failure to remove ineffective teachers is child abuse.
To which we have an answer:
Liberal teachers are not teachers and also not human.
To be human is to have a brain, and to have a brain is to use it, and to use it is NOT to believe in cr*p that never has and never will work .....evah!!!
A poor performing teacher in the classroom violates the human rights of the students in that classroom. If your performance is below standards in most any work place, you’re fired! The union shows its true colors, and they cast a sham upon the entire education system!
We need to remember that unions are not responsible for the education of our children, accountable to the taxpaying public or parents. Unions are only responsible to teachers and their promotion and self preservation. Where does it say that failing to be an effective teacher, as judged by the results of most public education, violates any human right? The claim is straight from the Progressive, Saul Alinsky model of “critical theory” where the ends justifies the means. Use the “LANGUAGE OF THE PEOPLE”, lie, cheat and attack anyone who oppose you, whatever it takes to prevail. This is jungle warfare folks, without the mosquitoes.