To: scottjewell
Yes, this is why a change of cultural perspective is needed: If the times shifted, and the agenda went out of fashion (and going out of fashion is about the worst thing to happen in America these days ) then these companies would quietly divest themselves of this agenda and its ideology.
Are you saying we should do what everyone else is doing and forget what we believe is wrong to please people?
35 posted on
06/19/2012 9:36:35 AM PDT by
Linda Frances
(Woe to those who call evil good and good evil, who put darkness for light and light for darkness)
To: Linda Frances; scottjewell
Are you saying we should do what everyone else is doing and forget what we believe is wrong to please people?
36 posted on
06/19/2012 9:43:29 AM PDT by
trailhkr1
(All you need to know about Zimmerman, innocent = riots, manslaughter = riots, guilty = riots)
To: Linda Frances; scottjewell
Are you saying we should do what everyone else is doing and forget what we believe is wrong to please people? I may be wrong but I think what he was meaning was these boycotts don't mean anything and the really important way is to change peoples views over a period of time..kinda like abortion. People who claim they are pro choice are less every year.
37 posted on
06/19/2012 9:44:49 AM PDT by
trailhkr1
(All you need to know about Zimmerman, innocent = riots, manslaughter = riots, guilty = riots)
To: Linda Frances
No, I am saying the opposite: Instead of boycotting stores, there should be (and should have been some time ago) an aggressive push back against the agenda, in every area of the culture.
38 posted on
06/19/2012 10:18:39 AM PDT by
scottjewell
(homosexual agenda,)
To: Linda Frances
I think the list was a really good idea; thanks for posting it - it shows just how far gone the situation is.
40 posted on
06/19/2012 11:05:59 AM PDT by
scottjewell
(homosexual agenda,)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson