Replies

Actually I am really starting to get ticked with the HATE on Mitt stuff I find here.. reminder.... two more Sotomayors and Kagans for your lack of efforts....

NO SALE.

You don't think Willard would nominate a tranny (like the one on the fed bench in CA) or muslim? Look at his nominee record from MA. You don't think Willard will "reach across the aisle" when choosing?

Worse yet, the lib that Willard nominates, who may be just as bad, will get Republican support.

Both choices are Evil and each brings different consequences just as bad. I don't think enough FReepers have wrapped their mind around the fact that a lib [R] president with congressional support is worse than a Marxist [D] president who congress fights. The real battle the next 4 years will be for Senate and the House to keep whichever Socialist in Chief, in check.

There is always the chance 0bamao will be impeached and removed, there is always the chance Willard will not be the nominee (for whatever reason). The GOP-e is trying to change the fundamental, core tenets of the Republican party. They already have to a large extent. They are counting on you to "evolve". WhyTF does this "evolve" chit always follow the path of liberalism? Good question right? The media would have you believe this. When was the last time this media/politician-described progress involved a movement towards conservative/constitutional principals? That's where the real battle lies, and that is why a liberal like Willard was foisted on the [R] ticket. Will you "evolve" like your GOP-e masters expect? Do you TRULY think the message received by voting for Mitt is ABO? Hahaha! The message received by voting Mitt is "I am evolving just like Mitt and the GOP-e". Even the so-called "GOP Young Guns" tried to prop up that loser Lugar. Sickening. Follow your conscience, follow your morals, follow your spirituality: vote and fight for Conservatives.

kev, THAT was an excellent post. VERY WELL SAID.

I don't think enough FReepers have wrapped their mind around the fact that a lib [R] president with congressional support is worse than a Marxist [D] president who congress fights. The real battle the next 4 years will be for Senate and the House to keep whichever Socialist in Chief, in check.

I sure hope ABO Republicans move past their fear and wrap their mind around the truth you post above before November. Conservatives in the Senate and the House will have a lot easier time keeping in check the next Socialist in Chief if that SiC got in on a plurality where most Americans voted for somebody else. Lack of popular mandate made Clinton vulnerable enough that the Republican Revolution and impeachment happened.

The risk of losing conservative ground with a weak Obama is LESS than the risk of losing conservative ground with a "popular mandate" progressive Republican Romney. Obama is in big trouble with his support, and there's very little chance he could get a majority of the vote in 2012; on the other hand, there is real danger Romney could get a landslide, which would be the kiss of death for conservatism in the Republican party. The best way to vote is to vote "for" reducing the popular mandate of whichever of these clowns wins, and the way to vote "for" that is to vote third party.

It is very clear that this is true, but fear is temporarily blinding a lot of good patriots. I pray that their vision and minds clear before November.