To: rawhide
Well, the books are not "cooked".
...Just omitted one of the ingredients from the recipe....
Nothing like leaving out the sour data from one big state to sweeten the message.
2 posted on
10/11/2012 10:57:59 AM PDT by
ptsal
(E)
To: ptsal
RE: ...Just omitted one of the ingredients from the recipe....
So, if the ingredients WERE INCLUDED in the recipe, what would the unemployment rate be?
To: ptsal
Translation: “We did NOT, I repeat NOT, exclude any data. We did however include the absence of certain data.”
9 posted on
10/11/2012 11:06:41 AM PDT by
Publius Maximus
(It was a nice Republic, while it lasted.)
To: ptsal
Well, the books are not "cooked".
...Just omitted one of the ingredients from the recipe....
Nothing like leaving out the sour data from one big state to sweeten the message. I'm sure the 0bama regime thought they could get away with their little ruse, but it served it's purpose - those morons that support comrade 0bama believe the numbers.
18 posted on
10/11/2012 11:29:23 AM PDT by
The Sons of Liberty
("Get that evil, foreign, muslim, usurping, gay bastard out of MY White House!" FUBO!)
To: ptsal
ONE of the ingredients, this is not Rode Island or Alaska. This is California. It is 10% of the entire population of the country. It is also a state with one of the highest unemployment rates in the country and has been mired in a four year depression!
25 posted on
10/11/2012 11:50:18 AM PDT by
Jim from C-Town
(The government is rarely benevolent, often malevolent and never benign!)
To: ptsal
Well, the books are not "cooked".Or, the books were cooked and the lashback was much stronger than the BLS expected so they made up the Calif story.
31 posted on
10/11/2012 1:53:43 PM PDT by
upchuck
(I miss my dog Snoopy. May 16, 1997-September 24, 2012 -- 15 years, 4 months. Forever in my heart.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson