Nothing personal but that is a pretty silly comment. For one thing boyotting a outdoors/gun show has nothing to do with the U.S. Constitution. As far as the gun show itself goes, the organizers themselves are actively creating a ban on assault weapon style rifles. If the people who don't want these type of weapons banned choose not to attend, more power to them. Let the law of economics punish the lefty's who will then profit less from the show.
Of course it has everything, Sir, to do with the U.S. Constitution: It means intent against the Second Amendment- and intent and motive can be provable in any court of law,
Webster:
To bear arms:
Actually it means more than that:
1887 Webster`s Dictionary:
“to bear, bear v.t., “
“1. to support and move; or carry
2. To be equipped, furnished, or marked with;
to have as belonging, distinguishing, identifying, or characterizing; as to bear a sword, an inscription,, a title, a good reputation or an evil look,
7. To be directed; to be pointed; as, to plant guns to bear upon a trench”
[means to carry across state lines as my ancestors brought their own arms to Bunker Hill 1775 and to the Battle of Saratoga 1777 from Massachusetts, Vermont and New Hampshire
[means to carry weapons to anywhere, even a gunshow, all kinds of weapons -period-
cf Alameda County CA vs GunShows - Alameda County lost that decision -
can we get the names and addresses of all the boycotters and publish them please