[Renegade]

If anything it should be called Revolutionary War II not Civil War!An inside military takeover would solve a lot of messy problems.

[izzatzo]

“It will be ALL Americans, including their military, against the Marxist anti-Americans destroying America, which means politicians, their lawyers and their leftist minions in the press. I wouldn’t want to be them when they finally succeed in pushing the nation to internal war.”

I can live with that, our “ruling class” politicians, MSM, etal need to be held accountable, need to be put down bigtime.

[MrB]

Oh, I’d take it further and call it Revoutionary War III.
I - 1776 - win
II - 1863 - loss
III - 201X - tie breaker

[RJS1950]

Not a civil war, there is no defined division of states or territory. This is more of a 2nd revolution situation and I believe that we are moving toward a 1776 moment.

FUBO & FAD

[dljordan]

“If anything it should be called Revolutionary War II not Civil War!An inside military takeover would solve a lot of messy problems.”

Perhaps that’s why so many military leaders are being replaced with political hacks?

[IbJensen]

The problem is today that many, if not all, of the serving generals are of the political persuasion. They are politically correct zombies who owe their stars to the political class.

[fr_freak]

If anything it should be called Revolutionary War II not Civil War!An inside military takeover would solve a lot of messy problems.

Couldn't disagree with you more. There is a reason the Founders made the civilian, elected President the Commander-in-Chief, and that is because they recognized the danger of an independent military. If we do this Revolution II thing, it has to be led by the civilian population. The military can join us, but if we were to allow the military to take full control, we risk becoming a dictatorship every bit as much as we risk under communists like Obama. I think most military guys (of honor) would agree with me.