Posted on 03/22/2013 4:14:53 PM PDT by ravager
(VATICAN CITY) Pope Francis called Friday for more dialogue with Islam and offered an olive branch to China and other countries that dont have diplomatic relations with the Holy See.
In his first foreign policy address as pope, Francis delivered his remarks in Italian rather than the traditional French another indication that the Argentine-born pope is less than comfortable speaking languages other than Italian and his mother-tongue Spanish.
The occasion was an audience with ambassadors from the 180 countries that have diplomatic relations with the Holy See, in which Francis explained he would work for peace, the poor and to build bridges between peoples. He noted that even his title pontiff means bridge-builder.
Francis said it was important to intensify dialogue among different religions particularly dialogue with Islam and to deepen the churchs outreach to atheists.
Read more: http://world.time.com/2013/03/22/pope-dialogue-with-islam-olive-branch-to-china/#ixzz2OJUUJOyP
(Excerpt) Read more at world.time.com ...
LOL, I hope you find that online argument that you are so desperate for.
> I am sure the Pope meant well.
>
> This Pope would make a great ally for Obama.
Hussein could extend his evil reach.
Yeah cuz you don’t have any. And I don’t know what exactly you find so amusing.
The Holy See is a sovereign state, but the Pope is not just the head of state of the Vatican City; he is also the head of the Roman Catholic Church, and these two roles are separate and distinct. If tomorrow the Italian government decided to seize the Vatican this would not make a difference with regards to the Pope's status within the Church.
Moreover, the Catholic Church (of which I am a member( regards itself as divinely sanctioned and exclusively so among religious congregations; accordingly, she considers herself the only legitimate religious force in the world.
The consequences of this state of fact is thus: the Pope may engage the Holy See in diplomatic relations with a non-Catholic temporal state, but he has no authority whatsoever to engage the Church in diplomatic relations with what Catholicism affirms to be illegitimate religious forces. It would be analogous to the U.S. saying that it did not recognize the Republic of China (based in Taipei) as the legitimate government of China but setting up an embassy there anyway. This is the problem with attempting to engage in "dialogue with Islam."
Naturally, of course, an individual Catholic may engage in dialogue with an individual Muslim. But this is different from the CATHOLIC CHURCH engaging in dialogue with ISLAM. Doctrinally, the Catholic Church has absolutely nothing to learn from Islam and "Islam," defined as it is by rejection of certain fundamental Catholic teachings (notably the Incarnation) cannot benefit from Catholicism without destroying itself (affirming the truth of Catholicism would be tantamount to denying the validity of Islam).
So what were you trying to say?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.