Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: oxcart
The money would be used to find the right small asteroid.

I wish Ears would leave science to the professionals and stop interjecting his 99 IQ into the mix.

To minimize the risk, this asteroid they're talking about had better be smaller than the one that just struck Russia last month (that baby could've conceivably taken out a large city, had the parameters been a little different), in which case, a hundred million bucks seems excessive.

Better to leave it where it is, imo, and send a robotic probe to it, than bring it back here. Then, if it's found to have lots of platinum, gold, rubies, whatever, let the robots mine it in place and bring the good stuff back, while leaving the worthless stuff where it is.

15 posted on 04/05/2013 1:37:38 PM PDT by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: LibWhacker

Lets not also dismiss the problem of gravitation. It won’t happen fast, but parking a rock at a sufficient distance from the moon could cause enough wobble to disrupt tides, weather, aurorae, etc.

This is a harebrained scheme that could cause real world problems. We’d be better off parking it at a La Grange point and taking trips out to study it.

Nelson is an embarrassment.


19 posted on 04/05/2013 1:43:53 PM PDT by rarestia (It's time to water the Tree of Liberty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson