[absolootezer0]

On the one hand, state employees have WAY too much power. On the other hand, if they don’t take away the child and the boyfriend, girlfriend kills the child in a drunken/drugged rage then the employee gets blamed. That’s the employee’s incentive to heck, just take the kid. It’s no skin off the employee’s nose and it’s the less risk option for the employee.

state employees are more likely to go after a white, working middle class family for child removal than anyone else. they're the easiest targets: less likely to be prone to violence, less likely to be able to afford a really good lawyer, more likely to let the state take the child without much of a fight, until after the fact.

[Carry_Okie]

state employees are more likely to go after a white, working middle class family for child removal than anyone else. they're the easiest targets: less likely to be prone to violence, less likely to be able to afford a really good lawyer, more likely to let the state take the child without much of a fight, until after the fact.

White kids are also worth more money to the bureaucrats. The State gets an incentive from the Feds for a quick adoption. White kids are easier to adopt out.