Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TigersEye

Well, let’s say you know about as much as is publcally available and have it stored handy.

IMHO from reading a lot about it (and I’d like your take on it), the feds told Nakoula to make film it (if indeed he really adid) along with that other dude whose name I can’t remember - the one who’s the cousin of Shoebat and who’s name begins with “S” - and then someone else dubbed it, showed it once in LA. Then it got sent to some imam or whatever they’re called in Egypt who put in on youtube.

The Nakoula guy must be useful to the feds and they have dirt on him so he had to do their bidding. He’s a nasty little man in his own right, making illicit money and helping to fund the PLA or something.

Hitlery et al had to be involved with this because there is no other way they would have even known about it, nor would they have tortted it out INSTANTLY as the “cause” of the supposed protests. It was also designed, imho, to further the “the future does not be belong to those who slander Islam” crap to repress free speech.

How I loathe this evil people.


79 posted on 05/11/2013 12:16:15 PM PDT by little jeremiah (Courage is not simply one of the virtues, but the form of every virtue at the testing point. CSLewis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies ]


To: little jeremiah
Well, let’s say you know about as much as is publcally available and have it stored handy.

OK, I'll cop to that. lol

My impression is that Nakoula made his video on his own (with partner) but it seems quite likely that he was led into it by some Fed handler. There were four versions and it's not clear that he had anything to do with altering the last one or two. He didn't upload the final one to the net. It's doubtful the cleric in Cairo found it on his own either. Someone forwarded it to him. Hmmm hmmm hmmm, who would do that?

Montagraph found shell companies within shell companies associated with movements on the web of the final version that had ties with a company that had security contracts with the DoD. Hmmm hmmm hmmm, isn't that interesting?

Nakoula's probation violation (or whatever it was) was well known to the Feds. They had let him slide before on bigger charges so why drop the hammer on him months after he made the "video?" His partner had a much longer history of felonies, well known to the Feds and all unprosecuted, so why hasn't he ever been picked up?

Two final facts make the whole thing very curious. One, Hillary is the first one known to bring public attention to the "video" with tweets from the Cairo embassy early on the morning of Sept. 11th. Two, in their repeated apologies and condemnations of the "video" Hillary and 0bama both made it a point to say "the U.S. government (or 'we' in one instance) had nothing to do with this "video."" A very strange thing to say because no one would have ever made that accusation. At least not without Montagraph's very obscure research and those odd repeated denials. Sounds an awful lot like fear of exposure was driving that.

81 posted on 05/11/2013 12:45:13 PM PDT by TigersEye ("No man left behind" is more than an Army Ranger credo it's the character of America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies ]

To: little jeremiah
...helping to fund the PLA or something.

I don't know about that. His partner was found to have some connections to some palestinians but, to the best of my memory, Nakoula was making money for Nakoula.

82 posted on 05/11/2013 12:47:40 PM PDT by TigersEye ("No man left behind" is more than an Army Ranger credo it's the character of America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson