Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Invention allows clear photos in dim light (graphene 1,000x more sensitive than CCD or CMOS)
PhysOrg ^ | 5/30/13

Posted on 05/31/2013 4:13:02 PM PDT by LibWhacker

Cameras fitted with a new revolutionary sensor will soon be able to take clear and sharp photos in dim conditions, thanks to a new image sensor invented at Nanyang Technological University (NTU).

The new sensor made from graphene, is believed to be the first to be able to detect broad spectrum light, from the visible to mid-infrared, with high photoresponse or sensitivity. This means it is suitable for use in all types of cameras, including infrared cameras, traffic speed cameras, satellite imaging and more.

Not only is the graphene sensor 1,000 times more sensitive to light than current imaging sensors found in today's cameras, it also uses 10 times less energy as it operates at lower voltages. When mass produced, graphene sensors are estimated to cost at least five times cheaper.

Graphene is only one-atom thick and is made of pure carbon atoms arranged in a honeycomb structure. It is known to have a high electrical conductivity among other properties such as durability and flexibility.

The inventor of the graphene sensor, Assistant Professor Wang Qijie, from NTU's School of Electrical & Electronic Engineering, said it is believed to be the first time that a broad-spectrum, high photosensitive sensor has been developed using pure graphene.

His breakthrough, made by fabricating a graphene sheet into novel nano structures, was published this month in Nature Communications, a highly-rated research journal.

"We have shown that it is now possible to create cheap, sensitive and flexible photo sensors from graphene alone. We expect our innovation will have great impact not only on the consumer imaging industry, but also in satellite imaging and communication industries, as well as the mid-infrared applications," said Asst Prof Wang, who also holds a joint appointment in NTU's School of Physical and Mathematical Sciences.

"While designing this sensor, we have kept current manufacturing practices in mind. This means the industry can in principle continue producing camera sensors using the CMOS (complementary metal-oxide-semiconductor) process, which is the prevailing technology used by the majority of factories in the electronics industry. Therefore manufacturers can easily replace the current base material of photo sensors with our new nano-structured graphene material."

If adopted by industry, Asst Prof Wang expects that cost of manufacturing imaging sensors to fall - eventually leading to cheaper cameras with longer battery life.

How the Graphene nanostructure works

Asst Prof Wang came up with an innovative idea to create nanostructures on graphene which will "trap" light-generated electron particles for a much longer time, resulting in a much stronger electric signal. Such electric signals can then be processed into an image, such as a photograph captured by a digital camera.

The "trapped electrons" is the key to achieving high photoresponse in graphene, which makes it far more effective than the normal CMOS or CCD (charge-coupled device) image sensors, said Asst Prof Wang. Essentially, the stronger the electric signals generated, the clearer and sharper the photos.

"The performance of our graphene sensor can be further improved, such as the response speed, through nanostructure engineering of graphene, and preliminary results already verified the feasibility of our concept," Asst Prof Wang added.

This research, costing about $200,000, is funded by the Nanyang Assistant Professorship start-up grant and supported partially by the Ministry of Education Tier 2 and 3 research grants.

Development of this sensor took Asst Prof Wang a total of 2 years to complete. His team consisted of two research fellows, Dr Zhang Yongzhe and Dr Li Xiaohui, and four doctoral students Liu Tao, Meng Bo, Liang Guozhen and Hu Xiaonan, from EEE, NTU. Two undergraduate students were also involved in this ground-breaking work.

Asst Prof Wang has filed a patent through NTU's Nanyang Innovation and Enterprise Office for his invention.

The next step is to work with industry collaborators to develop the graphene sensor into a commercial product.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: camera; graphene; invention; sensor
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last

1 posted on 05/31/2013 4:13:02 PM PDT by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
Sounds like the next-generation of night vision is on its way.
2 posted on 05/31/2013 4:16:28 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (It is the deviants who are the bullies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Sounds good, but still no color ....


3 posted on 05/31/2013 4:17:55 PM PDT by Ken522
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Ken522

Monochrome is the nature of the low-light beast.


4 posted on 05/31/2013 4:19:27 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (It is the deviants who are the bullies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Not gonna throw away my Nikon D4 just yet...


5 posted on 05/31/2013 4:19:59 PM PDT by OCMike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

If this is manufacturable, I can see lots of applications. Imagine taking sports photos of a football catch with a phone, not a 2000$ camera with an $8,000 lens to gather enough light. Or, a 3” telescope taking images without a clock drive that would have taken a 100” telescope a half-hour to develop.


6 posted on 05/31/2013 4:21:04 PM PDT by The Antiyuppie ("When small men cast long shadows, then it is very late in the day.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ken522

“Sounds good, but still no color ....”

CCD and CMOS sensors don’t detect colors, either. It’s done with on chip/off-chip filters. I don’t see why this won’t work the same way.


7 posted on 05/31/2013 4:22:57 PM PDT by The Antiyuppie ("When small men cast long shadows, then it is very late in the day.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
I live for the day night vision won't be any more complicated or expensive than a pair of sunglasses... "Why, yes, Doctor, I'd like my new glasses to be scratch-resistant, glare-proof, having high-impact transition lenses, with night vision."

Maybe this will get us closer!

8 posted on 05/31/2013 4:26:29 PM PDT by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: The Antiyuppie

Yep, this should be a huge boon for astronomers and cosmologists; any telescope will suddenly be a 1,000 times more powerful.


9 posted on 05/31/2013 4:29:09 PM PDT by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
30 years ago, detectors were already approaching 100% conversion efficiency: 1 photon = 1 electron. It's tough to increase that by "1000x"*.

Me thinks they are referring to the duration you can integrate the signal before reading it - which by itself is very useful.

*This is for "non-coherent" systems. Every application mentioned in the article supports this. Nothing in the article indicates otherwise.

10 posted on 05/31/2013 4:29:16 PM PDT by nevergiveup (When in Rome, speak Roman.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: The Antiyuppie
AND, best of all, this stuff is SOOOOOO FAST you can build in a jiggle that will allow the camera to take several thousand separate images which can be readily reassembled into 3D!

And all for the price of a teeny tiny instantly rechargable battery about the size of a sugar snap pea ~ made out of junk.

I think I see where this is headed ~

Just occurred to me this will make invisibility cloaks quite affordable.

11 posted on 05/31/2013 4:33:12 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: nevergiveup

There is no color information when you are converting photons to electrons, right?


12 posted on 05/31/2013 4:34:41 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (It is the deviants who are the bullies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: The Antiyuppie

Add loss of freedom to your list. The intrusiveness of government placed night vision cameras will invade society beyond anyone’s dreams. Americans are already accepting a government that can destroy organizations through taxation, environment agencies that raid lawful businesses, spying on the press, targeting auditing to close business and silence critics, etc... What a scary world we live in. I do not welcome technology that can destroy privacy put in the hands a of a government intent on crushing freedom.


13 posted on 05/31/2013 4:35:44 PM PDT by BushCountry (What does it matter now!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

thanks to a new image sensor invented at Nanyang Technological University (NTU).

Nanyang Technological University (NTU)is located in Singapore, They will probably share the invention with the ChiComs.

14 posted on 05/31/2013 4:38:19 PM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

it also uses 10 times less energy

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Is this to say that it creates energy?


15 posted on 05/31/2013 4:41:27 PM PDT by loungitude (The truth hurts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: kabar

Well duh! How else would our military be able to buy them?


16 posted on 05/31/2013 4:44:28 PM PDT by null and void (Republicans create the tools of opression, and the democrats gleefully use them!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
There is no color information when you are converting photons to electrons, right?

Depends on what you mean by "convert." Photons have subjective color information from their capture scenario. Whether that information gets converted into the resulting electron stream data is up to the conversion process.

17 posted on 05/31/2013 4:49:15 PM PDT by Talisker (One who commands, must obey.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

Well that will end the Night UFO flights!

As moper people have HD cams on them 24/7 the Alines shifted thier flights to night.

Now they have to stop altogether!

Even the Chupacabara and Big Foot wil also have to make adjustments to their patterns.


18 posted on 05/31/2013 4:50:26 PM PDT by NoLibZone (None here can be puzzled by why Jews walked into the cars so quietly- we are walking up the planks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
There is no color information when you are converting photons to electrons, right?

Let's keep it simple. The typical photodetector will release an electron whenever a photon of sufficient energy (>= "work function") bangs into it, knocking out an electron. The energy of the photon is directly proportional to its frequency = color. Therefore, to discriminate color with these type of detectors you put an optical color filter in front of each pixel that passes either Red, Green, or Blue. By knowing which detector pixel had which filter color, you can recreate the original image in RGB, which is how the human eye works. So while the color LOOKS very good there is actually a tremendous loss of spectral information occurring.

Moreover, most color cameras use a filter made up of tiles of filters, each tile having a square sub-grid of 2 Green pixels, 1 Red pixel, and 1 Blue pixel. Soooooo - the color also comes at the expense of reducing image resolution by 4.

19 posted on 05/31/2013 4:52:15 PM PDT by nevergiveup (When in Rome, speak Roman.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Talisker
Photons have subjective color information from their capture scenario. Whether that information gets converted into the resulting electron stream data is up to the conversion process.

huh?

20 posted on 05/31/2013 4:54:57 PM PDT by nevergiveup (When in Rome, speak Roman.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson