Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gillibrand: Some can’t distinguish between a ‘slap on the ass and a rape’
thehill.com ^ | 06/04/13 | Jeremy Herb

Posted on 06/04/2013 11:07:48 AM PDT by kimtom

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 next last
To: BatGuano
“...Better yet, how about ONLY WOMEN in the military? Let them fight the wars....”

Yeah right, one in 5 logistical vehicles will be dedicated to feminine products.

(not to malign our female military members- this is sarcasm)

21 posted on 06/04/2013 11:28:45 AM PDT by kimtom (USA ; Freedom is not Free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: kimtom

The question should also be asked in liberals can distinguish between a slap on the ass and a rape.

The evidence suffests not.


22 posted on 06/04/2013 11:29:18 AM PDT by chesley (Vast deserts of political ignorance makes liberalism possible - James Lewis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kimtom

If the goal was to absolutely destroy the US military could you devise a better plan than what is happening to it today?


23 posted on 06/04/2013 11:30:17 AM PDT by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kimtom

“PC will destroy their effectiveness. That, I believe is the goal.

This is will take time to correct. Given the nature of our enemies, i.e. Muslims (extreme) and instability in Asia, we’re going to get hurt........”

Your real enemy is your own current government.


24 posted on 06/04/2013 11:31:52 AM PDT by flaglady47 (When the gov't fears the people, liberty; When the people fear the gov't, tyranny.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: F15Eagle
“...They know exactly what they are doing. ...”

Absolutely, we have seen other conservative institutions brought down by these tactics....

we're losing man this war man.....

25 posted on 06/04/2013 11:34:21 AM PDT by kimtom (USA ; Freedom is not Free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Farmer Dean

Farmer Dean: “Get the rude,crude,and socially unacceptable men out.”

Forget the sarcasm tag? It’s the military, not a social club or a church. A good percentage of military members, both men and women, use foul language and joke explicitly about sexual matters. That’s not the same thing as inappropriate physical contact or rape. I’d prefer if they behaved like saints, but that’s not very realistic given American culture these days. Besides, the military exists to win wars.


26 posted on 06/04/2013 11:36:24 AM PDT by CitizenUSA (Why celebrate evil? Evil is easy. Good is the goal worth striving for.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Farmer Dean

Personally, I like my soldiers male, bad and dangerous to know. And I still say: get the broads out of the military.


27 posted on 06/04/2013 11:39:02 AM PDT by miss marmelstein ( Richard Lives Yet!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

Comment #28 Removed by Moderator

To: kimtom

Another F’n farce to use in the trashing of the military.

The number of reported abuses has risen. The number of verifiable and prosecutable (even in civilian courts) abuses has not really risen over the years.

False reports for various reasons has been going on for many years. I knew two individuals back in the 70s who were falsely accused, courts martialed and their lives ruined, prison time. In both cases their accusers later recanted and confessed to fraudulent reporting. Nothing happened to the false accusers and it took over a year to finally release each of them. In both cases they were accused because they had declined to continue a relationship with the women in question and the “scorned woman” revenge quickly followed.

I also knew of one guy charged and there was no doubt about his guilt. He was thrown out and into a military prison for many years. He truly was a dirtbag and deserved what he got.

Enough of this crap, it has been going on for too long (the baseless accusations that gain traction).


29 posted on 06/04/2013 11:49:19 AM PDT by RJS1950 (The democrats are the "enemies foreign and domestic" cited in the federal oath)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kimtom

20 plus years ago I predicted this... had a small incident that today could have gone horribly bad ...

P-3 Patrol 100 deg, 100% Humidity 45 min Preflight ... we take off I do my Integrity check report to the Pilot ... we had a female Flight Engineer Observer (Guest... it was a Checkflight, not a Mission) ...

After reporting to the Pilot I informed the female to keep her eyes forward as I needed to go to the back of the a AC and change into long johns and a dry flight suit. (It’s cold at altitude but we were also going to Maine)

No problems, nothing said during, post or on the return trip ... the day after we return I’m up on charges.

1 week later all Charges dropped and lil mis visitor was not ever invited back. This could have been a lot worse if the CO, XO and Command Master Chief were not involved... that’s what the folks that wish to have “outside authority” determine harassment charges.

If I hadn’t had 3 witnesses it may not have went as it did... as it was my Wife had to get involved and that is the part that ticked me off most, we were deployed often and she did not need that seed of worry.

Easy Solution to our current situation “NO Women in Combat... Period” (Support or Stateside kool).

Leave the UCMJ and how it is enforced alone.

TT


30 posted on 06/04/2013 11:58:52 AM PDT by TexasTransplant (Truth is the new pornography)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CitizenUSA

“I’d prefer if they behaved like saints, but that’s not very realistic given American culture these days.”

Soldiers Sailors and Marines never have been saints throughout history. It is not a result of today’s culture.

I served with many women over my career. I married a Woman Marine over 40 years ago. We both knew women who made or threatened guys with false accusations of rape. Many more who could outcuss any male Marine and who would talk about anything in any company.

As an AF officer I served with several female officers who had no qualms about talking about their sexual conquests and the men they’d had, unsolicited and in mixed company.

Historically it has been the same for soldiers. As noted in Kipling’s poem “Tommy” — Why, single men in barricks don’t grow into plaster saints —

But when the heat is on —

For it’s Tommy this, an’ Tommy that, an’ “Chuck him out, the brute!”
But it’s “Saviour of ‘is country” when the guns begin to shoot;

F**k the democrats, their party, their Fuehrer.


31 posted on 06/04/2013 12:00:16 PM PDT by RJS1950 (The democrats are the "enemies foreign and domestic" cited in the federal oath)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: BatGuano

Hm...although I disagree with this approach, it would probably shut up a lot of liberals, feminists, and democrat communists. Might just be the way to go.


32 posted on 06/04/2013 12:05:12 PM PDT by DennisR (Look around - God gives countless, indisputable clues that He does, indeed, exist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: kimtom
All this uproar about commanders overlooks an important consideration. One of the most important reasons for courts martial is to enforce discipline. That reason doesn't exist in civilian courts. Commanders must have the authority to convene CMs, and to review their findings.

I was once the senior officer on what amounted to a CM. Enlisted man was caught in a drug bust by civilian police. His Air Force job was handling bombs. The enlisted guys on the court wanted to hang him, although that wasn't a possibility. The ultimate decision by the court was a dishonorable discharge. Under the regs we didn't have any choice. It was that or a slap on the wrist. The convening commander reduced the punishment to general discharge. I thought it was a good decision on the commanders part. It was a civil crime, and the guy would be punished in a civilian court anyway.

33 posted on 06/04/2013 12:07:53 PM PDT by JoeFromSidney ( New book: RESISTANCE TO TYRANNY. Buy from Amazon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexasTransplant; RJS1950

Both stories illustrate the point; that false charges can and are occurring. This degrades performance and ties up resources.

The Military has a function and it is not PC.

How can we do our jobs if the threat of harassment overhangs operations.

(not to say it shouldn’t be guarded against and prosecuted)


34 posted on 06/04/2013 12:08:25 PM PDT by kimtom (USA ; Freedom is not Free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: TexasTransplant

What an awful story! All you did was change your clothes and this wimp goes hysterical. I truly feel for our men in the military. I really do.


35 posted on 06/04/2013 12:08:35 PM PDT by miss marmelstein ( Richard Lives Yet!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: TexasTransplant

In the early 80’s I had a young E3 go to a “long lunch” with another sailor (I’m thinking a male but not sure). She came back bragging about how nice the room in the Holiday Inn was where they had their “lunch”.

So I casually commented that I would like to have those kind of long lunches at home since all my kids were in school.

I was at the time a Chief.

With incredible speed I was being counseled by the Command something or other who’s job was to ensure equality of the sexes. Evidently I was sexually harassing the poor thing.

Needless to say, little miss screwing every day at lunch never got counseled but she sure as hell got moved to another part of the base.

Glad I retired when I did...


36 posted on 06/04/2013 12:09:28 PM PDT by msrngtp2002 (Just my opinion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: JoeFromSidney

While I was in, we had High Standards of conduct, our Flight Chief covered our backs, but when it came down to it, they washed out those that could not perform.

tolerance for abuse (drugs or otherwise) was Zero.

The big plus to an all volunteer force was quality (overall)
draftees, didn’t want to be there, so they escaped any way they could.

Nature of the Beast (so to speak)


37 posted on 06/04/2013 12:13:33 PM PDT by kimtom (USA ; Freedom is not Free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: kimtom

Neither could Ted Kennedy.


38 posted on 06/04/2013 12:19:33 PM PDT by servo1969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MrB

thanks, I said same in post 19...

Great minds....... they say... :)


39 posted on 06/04/2013 12:19:39 PM PDT by kimtom (USA ; Freedom is not Free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: kimtom

Or Bill Clinton.


40 posted on 06/04/2013 12:19:55 PM PDT by servo1969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson