The Navier Stokes equations describe fluid flow with changes in temperature and density. They are non-linear, chaotic, with sensitive dependence on initial conditions.
No finite set of past states is sufficient to make a non-trivial prediction of future states.
This has been known since the 1963 paper by Edward Lorenz
“Deterministic Nonperiodic Flow”.
To the extent that Anthropogenic Global Warming depends on predicting the future temperatures of the atmosphere in a distant future, to that extent it is a hoax.
Or basically there is just too much stuff going on for any modeling process we know of to keep tab of it. I agree. It’s Chicken Littling.
I mean AGW is Chicken Littling.