Interesting comments by Paul
1 posted on
03/10/2014 10:09:36 AM PDT by
jpsb
To: jpsb
It’s Paul vs Cruz. I like them both. But Paul scares me. He is the son of the father - who is a fruitcake when it comes to foreign policy.
2 posted on
03/10/2014 10:12:36 AM PDT by
nhwingut
(This tagline is for lease)
To: jpsb
“Trust, but verify” and being in Lebanon in the first place belie what he said.
3 posted on
03/10/2014 10:12:46 AM PDT by
Ingtar
(The NSA - "We're the only part of government who actually listens to the people.")
To: jpsb
Reagan was probably the most “anti war” (not the correct term I know) president of any of our lifetimes yet he got more done in fighting our enemies than most.
He just didn’t see a point in swinging a stick around if he didn’t intend to use it but he also kept a carrot available too.
5 posted on
03/10/2014 10:15:49 AM PDT by
cripplecreek
(REMEMBER THE RIVER RAISIN!)
To: jpsb
Lunch time, be back later.
7 posted on
03/10/2014 10:19:24 AM PDT by
jpsb
(Believe nothing until it has been officially denied)
To: jpsb
Reagan is partly to blame for Islamic militancy since he tucked his tail and ran after the barracks bombing.
22 posted on
03/10/2014 11:10:09 AM PDT by
Sam Gamgee
(May God have mercy upon my enemies, because I won't. - Patton)
To: jpsb
In the Middle East, Reagan strategically pulled back our forces after the tragedy in Lebanon in 1983 that killed 241 Marines, realizing the cost of American lives was too great for the mission.
Without a clearly defined mission, exit strategy or acceptable rationale for risking soldiers lives, Reagan possessed the leadership to reassess and readjust. Rand leaves out the part that as the bomb went off, invasion forces were steaming towards Grenada.
Before the week was over, we had invaded and conquered that nation.
28 posted on
03/10/2014 12:20:09 PM PDT by
ansel12
(Libertarianism offers the transitory concepts and dialogue to move from conservatism, to liberalism.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson