Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: george76

Sorry, folks, this one doesn’t flunk the aggie test.

First of all, at a cruising altitude of 60K (or higher), I’m surprised the U-2 would even be in the ATC system. The odds of another airplane colliding with a U-2 are approximately zero, since most jetliners have a service ceiling of no more than 45K. In fact, I find it surprising the U-2 would have its transponder on; if you’re the only aircraft at that FL, no reason to squawk, and no reason to switch it back on until you’re descending back into Beale, or whatever the final destination was.

Secondly, U-2s transit through SoCal airspace all the time, so the handling of this type of track shouldn’t confuse the ATC system (again, assuming the Dragon Lady is being tracked at 60K.

I’m wondering if the U-2 explanation is actually a cover for a test flight of the purported spy plane that was recently sighted over Texas. It would also certainly be a high-altitude platform; there are plenty of aviation firms in the Palmdale area (where the incident occurred) and Edwards AFB isn’t far away.


27 posted on 05/03/2014 2:05:04 PM PDT by ExNewsExSpook
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: ExNewsExSpook
At altitude you talk with ATC, just so they can monitor you. If you are at or above your classified altitude, you turn off the Mode-C. Thing is, squawking is no big deal and you are flying direct, so ATC is providing a flight following service more than anything.

As a side note, when you are getting ready to drop down into more crowded airspace, it is good to have been talking with them so you coordinated your decent with ATC. . .just so you don't surprise them.

38 posted on 05/03/2014 3:08:35 PM PDT by Hulka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson