[EagleUSA]

Wanting = deliberately lacking.

[Dilbert San Diego]

But let’s hope that the GOP takes the offensive, assuming they get control of the Senate.

I would like to see a GOP congress pass bills on these various subjects, then put Obama in the position of having to veto them. Let’s pass bills reflecting the conservative positions on the issues, then force him to veto if he disapproves. Then let Obama explain to the American people why he is vetoing so many bills passed to deal with our problems.

[skeeter]

Too bad the GOP refuses to associate these obvious failures with the ideology of progressivism that spawned them.

If they would do that liberalism would be spoken only in hell within a year.

[E. Pluribus Unum]

This presumes that Ayatollah Ubama's goal is the welfare of the United States, which is not the case.

[Colonel_Flagg]

But the top five issues listed above are the major ones that will drive the GOP's political offensive to win back the Senate in the next four months.

By electing candidates who will, in the main, not do what is required to affect the change the article makes so abundantly clear is necessary.

The revolution needed is not a Republican one but a conservative one. This is, of course, missing from the article.

[ilovesarah2012]

There is no Obama presidency. There is a Jarrett presidency.

[Eva]

The problem for the GOP in the mid-terms, is not going to be Democrat opposition, it will be the Libertarians who ate trying to divide the GOP.

[Bogey78O]

I’ve been calling him President Belshazzar for a while.

He likes to have his parties and parade the richness he presides over but never wants to be responsible for anything much less the purpose of his office.

[molson209]

He thinks a Speech gets things done

[hattend]

The Obama economy: No other issue is more critical in the minds of the voters

Nonsense. I offer the 2012 election as proof to back me up.

[stevem]

What can we expect when his only real competency is as a ward healing thug?