Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: driftdiver
No one is really sure why.

Not revealing the presence of WMDs was intentional or it was accidental.

It was with good reasons or it was with spurious reasons.

I vote for intentional and spurious.

12 posted on 10/31/2014 5:25:02 AM PDT by xzins ( Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! Those who truly support our troops pray for victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: xzins

There was a deliberate decision to coverup the WMDs. This wasn’t for operational reasons. The Iraqi’s knew what they had, the troops knew what they had, our enemy knew what was there. Only the public didn’t know for sure.

To deny medical care for troops exposed to these weapons for political reasons was and is criminal.


14 posted on 10/31/2014 6:15:26 AM PDT by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: xzins

I think the leftist blackmail is that there were no current visible program backed by rogue states, but “old” shells from a previous program that is spun out to be German backed with US design.

However project Sarindar was a Russian assistance of Saddam in erasing all traces of Russian production by sending the stuff to Syria...

This jumping on veterans is about a cover up in order to hide another cover up.


18 posted on 10/31/2014 12:23:53 PM PDT by lavaroise (A well regulated gun being necessary to the state, the rights of the militia shall not be infringed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson