Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: boop

So he shouldn’t even try?


5 posted on 02/10/2015 6:27:40 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet (The question isn't who is going to let me; it's who is going to stop me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: 2ndDivisionVet
"So he shouldn’t even try?"

No, I fully support the effort, but that horse has left the barn long ago.

Appelate courts have held that the 10th amendment is null and void, and that the 14th is "supreme".

But the 14th amendment says NOTHING about "gay marriage".

Doesn't say anything about abortion, either, but we ALL know how THAT has turned out.

The biggest problem is black robed tyrants making $hit up.

I'm really surprised just how few states have just sat there and taken this.

Seems a slam dunk on tenth amendment grounds.

Again, we're not talking 13th amendment with regards to slavery.

Gays aren't slaves.

Nobody is "preventing" them from having "unions".

The US constitution is silent on the matter of marriage anyway.

So we go back to the 10th amendment.

If states don't fight to the death on this, there is no hope of retaining a republic.

Even the gayest of the gays should be outraged by overturning state constitutions by fiat, but they aren't.

40 posted on 02/10/2015 7:27:50 PM PST by boop (I never use the words democrats and republicans. I use liberals and Americans.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson