[Bayan]

This is BS. This woman is not in a policy making position and her personal views have nothing to do with Walkers campaign or the way he would govern. It always amazes me how people get caught up in this kind of irrelevancy.

[PapaBear3625]

This is BS. This woman is not in a policy making position and her personal views have nothing to do with Walkers campaign or the way he would govern. It always amazes me how people get caught up in this kind of irrelevancy.

Correct. She is a PR person, paid to promote the message that the people who pay her want promoted. Much like a lawyer does in a courtroom.

[alstewartfan]

It’s not irrelevant. You can’t hire people who are internationalists; you dismiss them. I want people who represent AMERICA. Bob

[aquila48]

Let me see if I got you right... you would hire someone to get your message out whose beliefs are 180 degrees from yours.

http://www.lizmair.com/

[dragnet2]

This is BS. This woman is not in a policy position

#1. Why would a conservative Republican associate with and conduct business with, and put into such a prominent position, an individual who is obviously pro-amnesty?

#2. Would you do this?

#3. If Walker happened to become president and put in a leftist pro-amnesty sympathizer/supporter as spokesperson for the Border Patrol, would you support that too?

#4. Do conservative media/communications experts who do not support or sympathize with amnesty for millions of illegal aliens not exist?