If you want on/off this ping list, please let me know.
Please beware, this is a high-volume ping list!
CRUZ or LOSE! CRUZ or LOSE!Rand will make a fine stalking horse for Cruz.
“The Paul campaign dismisses the criticism. His team said the campaign website garnered more than 1 million views in the first 24 hours, with most coming from 24-35-year-olds. The candidate’s digital team, monitoring Facebook interactions and conversations about the senator, said he has been discussed in mostly positive terms among a broad cross section of voters since launching Tuesday.”
Never fear! In places where Paul is being discussed in NOT so “mostly positive terms”, his digital team will deploy an army of 24-35-year-old Paulbots to attempt to sway poll numbers, clearing the way for The Maggot.
Cruz trumps everybody running, period.
Interesting conversation with a friend earlier in the week re Cruz: he’s an Austin conservative (read “fiscal conservative/social libertarian) who voted for Cruz and said he never will again, because “Cruz changed”. His proof: Cruz acted like an attorney and advocate when in the Solicitor General’s office, but is now acting like a politician, “playing to his base”.
My thought: so? He WAS a legal advocate in the SG’s office. He IS running for political office. Friend couldn’t point to any issue on which Cruz has changed his position.
Cruz or lose.
Cruz vs. Paul
Social conservative vs. libertarian
I’ll side with Ted.
For that reason the GOPe is going after Paul.
Cruz / Palin to trump the Hildebeast...
Some women will only vote for a woman regardless of qualifications..
You sure about that?
I like the headline, but frankly, if Ed Rollins says Rand’s roll out was bad, it probably means it was good.
Is it just me, or are that many “conservatives” that in love with Rand Paul ..??
As a REAL “conservative” .. there is just no way I would ever vote for Rand Paul. He may be a nice guy and all, but his belief system is not aligned with mine.