Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: AdmSmith
The danger is due to its psychological effect nothing else.

Quite correct and shielding necessary to conceal and safely transport such a device would make it prohibitively heavy and large.

Much better bang for your buck with conventional explosives. Don't get me wrong it will make a big mess but that is about it.

20 posted on 06/08/2015 3:29:34 PM PDT by usurper (Liberals GET OFF MY LAWN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]


To: usurper

The shielding would depend on the radiation involved. If the isotope’s decay does not have much in the gamma, but more in the alpha and beta, the shielding requirement is comparatively reduced. This is especially the case for an alpha emitter, which can be shield with Saran Wrap. Ingesting alpha emitting material though is quite nasty. An example is the polonium tea served to a Russian dissident.


22 posted on 06/08/2015 4:28:52 PM PDT by Fred Hayek (The Democratic Party is now the operational arm of the CPUSA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

To: usurper

[Much better bang for your buck with conventional explosives. Don’t get me wrong it will make a big mess but that is about it.]

If such a device were detonated in New York’s financial district—New York Stock Exchange, Federal Reserve Bank of New York, Wall Street, etc.—it could cause a big, negative ripple before the site was cleaned up and confidence restored. The weapon could be delivered in a large truck.


31 posted on 06/10/2015 1:12:24 PM PDT by Brad from Tennessee (A politician can't give you anything he hasn't first stolen from you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson