[Mariner]

And since 2010 he has contributed exclusively to Republicans.

He just buys the party in power.

He needs their favor.

And, if you need the favor of Congress you have to pay for it.

I'd MUCH rather vote for the payer than the despicable payee.

BTW, Has Ted Cruz disclosed the list of folks who gave him his first $40mil yet? Just wondering if there's a Goldman Sachs connection.

How about Super Pacs, any announced or demonstrated for Cruz yet? He NEEDS THEM DESPERATELY to have a shot at the nomination, much less the General.

[SoConPubbie]

Boy have you sunk to new lows.

Not the same Mariner I have paid attention to over the years.

[SoConPubbie]

He just buys the party in power.

He needs their favor.

And, if you need the favor of Congress you have to pay for it.

If you have any values at all, you do not support the enemies (Democrats) of your freedoms, your liberties, your rights under the constitution.

This is why Trump should never be POTUS. He has no values, just a love for money.

[FreeReign]

He just buys the party in power.

He needs their favor.

And, if you need the favor of Congress you have to pay for it.

I'd MUCH rather vote for the payer than the despicable payee.

One, two, three, four rationalizations.

[Jim Noble]

Just wondering if there's a Goldman Sachs connection

Obviously, Heidi Cruz's work for Goldman Sachs won't be a problem until the Fall of 2016.

But it's equally obvious that it's a huge, and in my opinion an insurmountable problem once the Democrats have a nominee who will make money center banks the centerpiece of his campaign.

I've mostly stopped posting about this, because of all the abuse I get over it, but it's still true.

The husband of a Goldman Sachs managing director, "on leave" or not, is not going to be elected President in 2016. That's a fact.