Posted on 06/19/2015 8:06:22 AM PDT by Mozilla
On Thursday, 2016 Democratic presidential frontrunner Hillary Clinton blamed the Charleston, South Carolina church shootings by racist Dylann Roof on the rhetoric of 2016 Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump.
Speaking with host John Ralston, she explained, “Public discourse is sometimes hotter and more negative than it should be, which can, in my opinion, trigger someone who is less than stable.” She continued, “I think we have to speak out against it. Like, for example, a recent entry into the Republican presidential campaign said some very inflammatory things about Mexicans. Everybody should stand up and say that’s not acceptable.”
Presumably, Hillary was referencing Trump’s comments during his announcement speech in which he said Mexico was sending people across the border: “They’re not sending their best. They’re not sending you. They’re not sending you. They’re sending people that have lots of problems, and they’re bringing those problems with us. They’re bringing drugs. They’re bringing crime. They’re rapists. And some, I assume, are good people.”
Dylann Roof murdered nine people at a historically black church. There are no reports he was a fan of Donald Trump, or that Roof shot six black women and three black men after being inspired by Trump’s rhetoric about Hispanic illegal immigrants.
But facts have no bearing on such nonsensical arguments. This hatred for the First Amendment – the European notion that freedom of speech must be curtailed in order to avoid triggering the unstable or evil – has become a hallmark of the left.
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
I don’t suppose she’ll be offering any actual evidence to support this charge.
wow. pathological.
His speech patterns now or recently were not responsible for a reported 6 month plan to commit the heinous crime in Charleston. She’s nothing better than an ambulance chasing lawyer.
The Donald will not waste any time with a rebuttal.
Let's see how long that Clinton love last.
I am wondering if we should SUPPORT her nomination ?
She is so unlikeable...
But I worry she will pick Warren, and you KNOW there are women stupid enough to vote for an all-girl ticket just because.
In fact, I think electing Warren is the ONLY thing that would help her win an election
If she does, then we NEED to have Palin/Cruz or it will be tough to counter that.
She is pandering and exploiting those families in South Carolina and should be severely admoninished.
Her presence is inflammatory to me because she is a joke and should be in jail for Benghazi.
He already has replied, 7:42 am this morning -
“Hillary Clinton reaches a new low”
https://twitter.com/realdonaldtrump
(and, of course, outraged Bleeding-Heart Liberals are already furiously flaming him in the Twitter comments section)
Eventually, she’ll waddle out onto a stage on that sloped ramp with barriers on both sides and she’ll trip and fall.
The Left - “Shut up! I have something to say.”
I would say the Clinton love will evaporate. The left will always hate Trump.
meanwhile, frumpy hillary speak drives ISIS action
So its the fault of “The Donald” that the killer did what he did. Good to know. Hillary, you are the biggest loon at the head of a parade of galactically deranged gimmedat morons. The really sad thing is that she has people both in and out of the faculty lounges that believe her.
definitely a good idea for the dem front runner to sqawk it out with a lower tiered pub candidate
Blame game...
And to think he had some nice things to say about the Clinton’s yesterday.
A Donald Trump verbal nuke headed Hillary’s direction in 10...9...8...
Will she be returning any money he donated to her?
Dems throw these stink bombs because they know there will be no return fire from the beltway GOP eunuchs.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.