Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: theBuckwheat

The biggest step is to return to a popular acknowledgement of the Lord, and nowhere does this call for, or need, a “theocracy.”


10 posted on 07/05/2015 3:24:14 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: HiTech RedNeck

Simple solution: the government should figure out benefits to acceptable unions, but marriages can be the province of churches and they can define what each church will accept, or won’t accept. Never shall the twain meet.

Or said another way, the State can join people for benefits, but the State doesn’t even talk about marriage.


25 posted on 07/06/2015 4:41:11 AM PDT by mavfin (Personal Freedom, Personal Responsibility)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: HiTech RedNeck

Yes, exactly. Where people internalize God’s Law and God’s love, the only role for government will be for administrative matters. But humanity in this present age does not have that desire and so we must have governments that can only threaten death, making this age “the administration of death” twice over.

“Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.”

– John Adams

If people can government themselves, there is no need for an external force to perform that function. Contrariwise, if they cannot or will not govern themselves, then what? Somalia or South Chicago comes to mind.


26 posted on 07/06/2015 8:51:03 AM PDT by theBuckwheat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson