Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Biggirl

So Carson is changing his tune and is now saying that there should be a religious test for the president, Constitution be damned? Not surprising given some of his other policy proposals. Ted Cruz is right. There is a difference between saying you could not vote for a candidate because they are a Muslim and saying that someone should not run because they are a Muslim. The first is entirely appropriate as each person makes their voting decisions based on their own criteria. The second violates Article VI of the Constitution.


14 posted on 09/21/2015 5:24:42 AM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: DoodleDawg

Neither violates the constitution- both are statements of opinion by someone who is not holding political office, not actions by someone who was able to implement such. As mere statements of political opinion they are protected by the first amendment.


22 posted on 09/21/2015 5:31:26 AM PDT by piasa (Attitude adjustments offered here free of charge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: DoodleDawg

No moslem can take the oath of office because no moslem can agree that the US Constitution is the rule of law, only Sharia is the rule of law for ALL moslems. Ipso facto no moslem can be president of the United States or hold ANY office that requires that they agree to follow the US Constitution.

All I ever needed to learn about islam I leaned on 09/12/2001. moslems are disqualified from holding almost all local, state and federal offices.


29 posted on 09/21/2015 5:40:38 AM PDT by isthisnickcool (Say what you will about The Donald, but he has all the right enemies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson