To: tcrlaf
One of Hillary’s manpads?
7 posted on
10/31/2015 12:42:59 AM PDT by
867V309
(Trump: Bull in a RINO Shoppe)
To: 867V309
“One of Hillary’s manpads?”
If it is, they’ll be hell to pay.
8 posted on
10/31/2015 12:43:41 AM PDT by
tcrlaf
(They told me it could never happen in America. And then it did....)
To: 867V309
That’s what worries me, also.
10 posted on
10/31/2015 12:46:24 AM PDT by
SaveFerris
(Be a blessing to a stranger today for some have entertained angels unaware)
To: 867V309
One of Hillary’s manpads? It would have to be a super-Manpad from the future to hit something at 30-35 thousand feet.
To: 867V309
77 posted on
10/31/2015 4:04:56 AM PDT by
combat_boots
(The Lion of Judah cometh. Hallelujah. Gloria Patri, Filio et Spiritui Sancto!)
To: 867V309
Out of range for a MANPADS of any kind. Most of them top out at less than 1/3rd the altitude the airliner was at.
82 posted on
10/31/2015 4:36:05 AM PDT by
Spktyr
(Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
To: 867V309
Not at 31k. MANPADS can't get that high. Theoretically, they may make it to that altitude, but combine the need for forward quarter detection, speed, altitude, etc, and the shot becomes impossible.
Maybe a bomb on board in retaliation for Russian activity in Syria?
84 posted on
10/31/2015 4:43:56 AM PDT by
USNBandit
(Sarcasm engaged at all times)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson