Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

( Vanity ) If Ted Cruz is the Republican nominee
2/15/2016 | mike70

Posted on 02/15/2016 5:54:49 PM PST by mike70

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 221-224 next last
To: mike70

So some head winds in this discussion.

First is the issue of effect in that in order for there to be a viable suit, there has to be a harmful effect aka standing. The first chance that I see this happening would be after Sen Cruz has been made the nominee. From there, it is possible that another candidate could sue but they would have to sue the party. Courts have be very reluctant to take such a case.

So this then sets up the next barrier which would be that the suit would be brought before a state election board. Again, this would be hard to over come the precedent set by the State of Illinois board of elections.

So lets assume the state rules in Sen Cruz’s favor and now we have the first chance to bring to a federal level. Got to get on the docket and NORMALLY would have to wait its turn to be heard. This can take several months and might just push it out beyond the convention date.

Now assume that this happens in two different states and both get to the federal level. I am told that when there are parallel law suits, that there is an attempt to combine them if possible. I am no legal expert but I imagine that this would further delay the ruling.

Now once there is a difference between two districts, then there is a “requirement” for SCOTUS to make a determination, but this still need to get into the SCOTUS docket. Argument calendars are set at least 2 to 3 months out for SCOTUS. This is to allow time for both sides to develop their briefs and to allow for amicus curie briefs to be filed. These have to be reviewed and a date for arguments set.

After some time for arguments, the justices then go off, write up their opinions, compare notes and attempt to sway others to their viewpoint. Again this takes time.

So I am of the opinion that there is not enough time for this to happen before the election. Because one side could be irrecoverably harmed by a ruling to remove the candidate from the ballot, I am of the opinion that the courts would issue a stay to allow the election to take place.

Just my opinions here.


41 posted on 02/15/2016 6:22:36 PM PST by taxcontrol ( The GOPe treats the conservative base like slaves by taking their votes and refuses to pay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JoSixChip

The Dominion of Canada doesn’t get to decide who is, or is not a natural born US citizen.


42 posted on 02/15/2016 6:23:16 PM PST by Mr. Lucky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: fireman15

They would not need much wiggle room. One citizen parent and born outside the country. If Obama was born in Kenya would he be NBC? Cruz is not NBC either.


43 posted on 02/15/2016 6:23:57 PM PST by jospehm20
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: lonestar67

RE: Illinois reviewed your question.

They said he could appear on the ballot

______________________________

New Hampshire did as well. Same result.


44 posted on 02/15/2016 6:24:37 PM PST by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: lonestar67; mike70; Oldeconomybuyer; big'ol_freeper
You'll do it without me.

So now, the question you have to ask yourself, how many more individuals in our nation understand The Founders intent with the eligibility clause? The eligibility clause would never have been written if any citizen could be President. So, do you feel lucky?

45 posted on 02/15/2016 6:24:41 PM PST by higgmeister ( In the Shadow of The Big Chicken! Trump 2016 - and Dude, Cruz ain't bona fide either)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: mike70

“If Ted Cruz is the Republican nominee”; all will be happy in the world.
Donald Trump will end his business career, shave his head, and join the singing group Up With People.


46 posted on 02/15/2016 6:24:49 PM PST by HereInTheHeartland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mike70
Your question is irrelevant. Cruz is a citizen-at-birth, tantamount to the Constitution's 'natural born citizen', and fully eligible to serve as the President.

Note further that legal challenges to Cruz's candidacy have been filed in five states -- Iowa, New Hampshire, South Carolina, Nevada and Illinois. All have been rejected.

However, the technical answer to your question is that, in the event of a SCOTUS tie, the individual Circuit Court decisions would be left standing -- but they would apply only within the geography of that particular circuit.

47 posted on 02/15/2016 6:25:26 PM PST by okie01 (The Mainstream Media: IGNORANCE ON PARADE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Lucky

No, but they do get to decide who is a NBC Canadian and Cruz was. Don’t forget that Cruz just renounced his Canadian citizenship in 2014.


48 posted on 02/15/2016 6:25:52 PM PST by jospehm20
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Lucky
The Dominion of Canada doesn't get to decide who is, or is not a natural born US citizen.

And unfortunately for cruz, nether do you.
49 posted on 02/15/2016 6:26:03 PM PST by JoSixChip (Ted Cruz (R-Goldman Sachs) - DC Values)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: JoSixChip

You just keep pretending that you know the answer to a question that has never been adjudicated. It’s hilarious.


50 posted on 02/15/2016 6:27:08 PM PST by TigersEye (This is the age of the death of reason and rule of law. Prepare!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: higgmeister

You are correct, and Cruz is a NBC, he was not naturalized because he was born to a US citizen, just like my children born overseas because of my military service are NBCs not needing naturalization. Your argument is stupid.


51 posted on 02/15/2016 6:28:23 PM PST by big'ol_freeper (Trump: "Planned Parenthood does wonderful things")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: nclaurel

I stand by my argument.

People need to stop making stuff out of this.

Legal arguments can be made against anyone. People can be indicted at anytime.

There is no good reason to believe that Cruz would be removed from ballots.


52 posted on 02/15/2016 6:29:21 PM PST by lonestar67 (Trump is anti-conservative / Cruz 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: mike70

South Carolina allowed Cruz on their ballot for the primaries.... so that’s four states that have already de facto, ruled that he is eligible — Illinois, New Hampshire ( the Board of Elections of these two states have OFFICIALLY given their decision that they deem him to be Natural born ).

Iowa did implicitly by not contesting his delegates when he won there.

South Carolina still has the chance now but nothing has ever been filed in court or at their elections board regarding this issue ( other than Trump’s verbal fulminations ).

If there are any more issues, now is the time for other states to file suit to stop his name from being in the primaries.


53 posted on 02/15/2016 6:29:39 PM PST by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing
"Cruz would still need 270 electoral votes regardless of what the courts decided."

Hillary would most likely get that and then we all win, right?

54 posted on 02/15/2016 6:30:06 PM PST by mikey_hates_everything
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: John Valentine
You would be better advised to worry about the composition of the Court if Cruz does NOT prevail. Should that happen, God help us all.

It is a moot point. Cruz will prevail only if he is not challenged or he is challenged if he is ruled eligible by a panel of the most liberal judges in the country. Regardless of how strongly you believe in his eligibility, Cruz's fate in the upcoming election will likely depend on the judgment of a panel of liberal judges.

People keep thinking that Donald Trump has been goaded into confrontations by the Cruz team. It could easily be the other way around so that Trump can file suit against Cruz without a backlash. Donald Trump is a chess player... the rest of the field are playing checkers.

Before the death of Justice Scalia there was a good chance the Supreme Court would rule in Cruz's failure. Now they will most likely deadlock and the lower court's decision will stand. If this doesn't scare the beejeebies out of you I don't know what will.

55 posted on 02/15/2016 6:31:59 PM PST by fireman15 (Check your facts before making ignorant statements.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye
You just keep pretending that you know the answer to a question that has never been adjudicated.

Really, so your arguing that Cruz father was an American? And I'm pretending? Someone with the littlest amount of self-respect might be embarrassed posting like your are, but not you. Ignorance is bliss, I guess.
56 posted on 02/15/2016 6:32:14 PM PST by JoSixChip (Ted Cruz (R-Goldman Sachs) - DC Values)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: higgmeister

I don’t think Trump likes Conservatives .

I think he hates them in fact.

He and his followers attack conservatives at every turn.

he has not attacked Hilary or Sanders with the viciousness he and his supporters reserve for Cruz and other conservatives.

When Carson was the leader, Trump called him a psychopath.

I think the RNC may rule that Trump is ineligible to be the nominee for whatever reason they choose.

Maybe Trump followers should give up since that may in fact happen.

Please explain to me how you know that the RNC will not dismiss Trump as an eligible nominee.


57 posted on 02/15/2016 6:32:49 PM PST by lonestar67 (Trump is anti-conservative / Cruz 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: fireman15

Sorry for the typos.


58 posted on 02/15/2016 6:33:29 PM PST by fireman15 (Check your facts before making ignorant statements.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: JoSixChip
Really, so your arguing that Cruz father was an American?

That's a lie. Where is your self respect? lol

59 posted on 02/15/2016 6:34:11 PM PST by TigersEye (This is the age of the death of reason and rule of law. Prepare!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: UMCRevMom@aol.com; onyx; RedMDer; trisham

GREAT LINK!!! Thanks for posting it!! It should be its OWN THREAD!!!


60 posted on 02/15/2016 6:34:23 PM PST by musicman (Until I see the REAL Long Form Vault BC, he's just "PRES__ENT" Obama = Without "ID")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 221-224 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson