Replies

I am sending an e-mail to the writer of the article. Maybe we will get a reply, but I won't hold my breath. Here is what I sent

David Sherfinski, yesterday morning there was an article you wrote in the Washington times with the headline:.

(Ted Cruz: Donald Trump sees protesters as disloyal people who must be punished)

Then later in the morning the headline was changed to read:

( Ted Cruz: ‘Protesters have no right to engage in violence’)

The body of each article read quite differently also. Here is how each article started out.

First article:

Ted Cruz: Donald Trump sees protesters as disloyal people who must be punished

Washington Times ^ | March 14, 2016 | David Sherfinski

Sen. Ted Cruz said Monday that GOP presidential front-runner Donald Trump views protesters as disloyal people worthy of punishment and that the best response to Mr. Trump is to defeat him at the ballot box, reiterating his own pledge to support the eventual Republican nominee in the fall.

Mr. Cruz re-upped criticism of Mr. Trump for recently having rally attendees pledge their support to him, likening it to an action kings and queens demand of their subjects.

“It’s also reflected in his treatment of protesters, where anyone who’s a protester is disloyal and must be punished,” Mr. Cruz told reporters in Illinois ahead of the March 15 primary there.

Second Article:

Ted Cruz: ‘Protesters have no right to engage in violence’

By David Sherfinski - The Washington Times - Monday, March 14, 2016

In response to recent unrest at GOP presidential front-runner Donald Trump’s events, Sen. Ted Cruz said Monday that protesters have no right to threaten or engage in violence, but that responsibility does start at the top in every campaign.

“I will say this: Protesters have no right to engage in violence,” Mr. Cruz told reporters in Illinois, also saying the protesters have no right to threaten violence or shout down other speakers.

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/mar/14/ted-cruz-donald-trump-sees-protesters-disloyal-peo/

I would appreciate it very much if you could explain to me, as to why and when the original article was changed?

Sincerely,