You folks are a strange group. You don’t admit for a minute that the coverage on Trump has been 100% negative from day one.
Cruz was benefited with thousands of hours of prime time slams of Trump at no cost.
These networks and news outlets donated tens of millions of dollars worth of hit pieces to Cruz’s campaign.
I don’t see any mention of that.
I don’t know about folks, but I am an American. As for the article, it merely points out a coverage of total media times. And it does mention the negative coverage of Trump. It’s all in there.
Furthermore, if anyone thinks there would be favorable coverage of the new front runner if they succeed (God forbid) in taking Trump out, they are delusional.
Especially since Cruz has been so dishonest in his campaign and tactics. He'll be toast if he ever becomes the nominee--he has given the media the tools with which to crush him.