Posted on 03/07/2017 2:27:54 PM PST by Innovative
The U.S. Senate on Tuesday revoked a rule that aimed to give the public more input into federal land management decisions, the latest move by the Republican-led Congress to undo Obama administration environmental regulations it sees as a burden.
The Senate voted 51-48 to approve a resolution to repeal the Bureau of Land Management’s Resource Management Planning rule, known as BLM 2.0, finalized in December by the Obama administration.
(Excerpt) Read more at reuters.com ...
“...to give the public more input...” translation - give the enviro-nazis more input.
Apparently you believe Trump was appointed Dictator. He does not control education except as a general rule. Legally he cannot do what you demand.
You want a list o names. How about the entire Democrat lineup in the Senate. It is possible that the WVa guy voted with the GOP.
Good. This doesn’t “give the public more input,” it gives GOVERNMENT MORE CONTROL.
6 is pretty close to 10.
Half of 10 is 5.
But you are only 6, so you had 4 more years in there.
But you just worry about half of those 4 extra years.
And 4 = 2+2.
So 5-2 = 3. So your sister is 3 when you are 6.
Now I’m not going through all of that B.S. again (and yes - that is how my kids were taught!) We also worked at home so they could do it the regular way. My one daughter could not do the common core way no matter how hard she tried. We finally met with the teacher and told her that if she got the right answer that was good enough for mom and dad.
Anyway - the answer of how old your sister is when you are 75 and she is half your age - she is 32.5! ;)
Everything that Obama did between Nov 8, 2016, and Jan 20, 2017, should be automatically revoked. Period. Especially his authorization of the sharing of surveillance intelligence with many other nations. REVOKE EVERYTHING NOW!
**************************
More like January 20, 2009 till January 20, 2017
“Fire all the federal “Cowboys” who harass ranchers’ families in the Western states. They are troublemakers.”
And at the same time, take away every last weapon the BLM has. If they need a Law Enforcement presence somewhere. make them ask the US Marshals to handle it. We have too many agencies with idiots with guns. Kate Steinle would be alive today if BLM “agents” didn’t have guns!
Good news.
Couldn’t agree more. But during his Presidency, he had more authority to do what he did. After the election, whatever he did was to just undermine the new Admin. I would love to see EVERYTHING Obama did rolled back.
he can ba as must of a dictator as obama was— you remember— phone and a pen and the cia and fbi to wire tap the opposition party!! It’s our turn now,Obama disregarded the immigration laws. I want the education laws disregarded among other laws that are destructive to this nation but I want immigration enforced to the hilt.
I sat in that class as the oldest person, and could not understand anything what was taught. It was always the long way round and carrying , adding, then going half, then multiple. It was so stupid
I asked my youngest boy the question I had previously written, and he said 35 at first, then got the right answer.
I asked how he got 67, . I still don;t understand ow he did it.
I told him if she is 3 years younger then just subtract 3 from 70. He said oh yea that is much easier.
Common core has to go as it is destroying kids in math.
I have what might be a dumb question—How come all of these rules and regulations that Obama and his administration did without congress are being not able to just be reversed with executive orders? If they didn’t go through the congress in the first place, why must we go through the congress to reverse them (other than perhaps having congress do it would provide for more permanency in future administrations).
For example, when he did the executive order for drilling offshore, all the talking heads said that the order would be permanent and future president’s couldn’t change it. Other than the fact that he is their god, what is this all about?
"Senate revokes Obama federal land-planning rule"
FR: Never Accept the Premise of Your Opponent’s Argument
Although federal policing of the environment is arguably a good idea, it remains that the states have never expressly constitutionally delegated to the feds the specific power to regulate INTRAstate environmental issues.
”From the accepted doctrine that the United States is a government of delegated powers, it follows that those not expressly granted, or reasonably to be implied from such as are conferred, are reserved to the states, or to the people. To forestall any suggestion to the contrary, the Tenth Amendment was adopted. The same proposition, otherwise stated, is that powers not granted are prohibited [emphasis added].” —United States v. Butler, 1936.
In other words, the corrupt, post-17th Amendment ratification Congress should have reprimanded lawless Obama Administration imo, for stealing and using state powers to police the environment to oppress the states and their citizens.
State sovereignty-ignoring lawmakers were probably scared of losing votes for reprimanding Obama on his unconstitutional actions.
Drain the swamp! Drain the swamp!
Remember in November ’18 !
Since Trump entered the ’16 presidential race too late for patriots to make sure that there were state sovereignty-respecting candidates on the primary ballots, patriots need make sure that such candidates are on the ’18 primary ballots so that they can be elected to support Trump in draining the unconstitutionally big federal government swamp.
Such a Congress will also be able to finish draining the swamp with respect to getting the remaining state sovereignty-ignoring, activist justices off of the bench.
Noting that the primaries start in Iowa and New Hampshire in February ‘18, patriots need to challenge candidates for federal office in the following way.
Patriots need to qualify candidates by asking them why the Founding States made the Constitution’s Section 8 of Article I; to limit (cripple) the federal government’s powers.
Patriots also need to find candidates that are knowledgeable of the Supreme Court's clarifications of the federal government’s limited powers listed below.
“Congress is not empowered to tax for those purposes which are within the exclusive province of the States.” —Justice John Marshall, Gibbons v. Ogden, 1824.
”State inspection laws, health laws, and laws for regulating the internal commerce of a State, and those which respect turnpike roads, ferries, &c. are not within the power granted to Congress [emphasis added].” —Gibbons v. Ogden, 1824.
”From the accepted doctrine that the United States is a government of delegated powers, it follows that those not expressly granted, or reasonably to be implied from such as are conferred, are reserved to the states, or to the people. To forestall any suggestion to the contrary, the Tenth Amendment was adopted. The same proposition, otherwise stated, is that powers not granted are prohibited [emphasis added].” —United States v. Butler, 1936.
Amen. My search engines turned up nothing in that regard.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.