Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Caddell: ‘It’s a Trump White House But Is This Going to Be A Ryan Government?’
Breitbart ^ | March 22,2017 | by Dan Riehl

Posted on 03/22/2017 8:40:30 AM PDT by Hojczyk

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 next last
To: Hojczyk

Caddell is a DEM but he’s also one of the more reasoned or reasonable ones. Remember it was he who was screaming at Obama and friends in Congress. The very election of Ryan as S.O.H. says something is very rotten in Congress within it’s rank and file members enough so that the Boehner Political Clone got elected to the position. There is some truth in what Pat is saying simply because of the Congress refuses to replace Ryan whom is as spineless and wishy washy as Boehner was. GOP-E tells Ryan what to do. That is why Congress feet must be held to the fire. The GOP-E sellouts goes all the way back to Boehner’s Coup on Newt and the GOP-E ending of Contract With America.


21 posted on 03/22/2017 8:59:48 AM PDT by cva66snipe ((Two Choices left for U.S. One Nation Under GOD or One Nation Under Judgment? Which one say ye?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk
God help us.

A Ryan government will lead to a Pelosi/Schumer government in 2018, and a Warren/Pelosi/Schumer government in 2020.

22 posted on 03/22/2017 9:03:57 AM PDT by bassmaner (Hey commies: I am a' white male, and I am guilty of NOTHING! Sell your 'white guilt' elsewhere.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tumblindice

The president can’t pass a bill, but Congress can override a veto.


23 posted on 03/22/2017 9:04:08 AM PDT by Alberta's Child (President Donald J. Trump ... Making America Great Again, 140 Characters at a Time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child

I personally have more faith that Trump can do his job and use the Bully Pulpit of the Presidency to move his agenda, than I have in Ryan to do his weaselly sabotaging of Trump behind the scenes and get away with it.

Time will tell, though.


24 posted on 03/22/2017 9:06:02 AM PDT by rlmorel (President Donald J. Trump ... Making Liberal Heads Explode, 140 Characters at a Time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk
“The great concern for the Trump administration is that it’s a Trump White House but is this going to be a Ryan government?”

Good question. And right now the likely answer is not a positive one.

25 posted on 03/22/2017 9:07:48 AM PDT by TTFlyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk
Is this going to be where they use him to impose what they want to do rather than supporting what he got elected to do?

That is the question.... since Ryancare is a crap bill.

The promises of "fixes" in round two and three is typical Rino speak to quiet the dissenters they see as ignorant electorates.

It seems quite reminiscent of Jonathan Gruber's play book.

26 posted on 03/22/2017 9:09:57 AM PDT by TXSearcher (Interesting times we live in...........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tumblindice

Personally, I think it was addressed in the Federalist papers.

In #69 Hamilton argued that the president’s authority would be “nominally the same with that of the King of Great Britain, but in substance much inferior to it. It would amount to nothing more than the supreme command and direction of the military and naval forces as first general and admiral of the confederacy” to quote one analyst
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federalist_No._69#cite_note-2

Federalist 76 makes some interesting observations on the balance between congress and the President.

#49 emphasizes that the power to impeach is a check against an imperial presidency.


27 posted on 03/22/2017 9:12:09 AM PDT by RedStateRocker (Nuke Mecca, deport all illegal aliens, abolish the IRS, DEA and ATF.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

Republican House members would do well to remember who brought them to the dance.

Hint: It wasn’t Paul Ryan.


28 posted on 03/22/2017 9:15:26 AM PDT by Arm_Bears (Rope. Tree. Politician/Journalist. Some assembly required.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Paul Ryan also changed after he failed as a VP candidate, and the Establishment told him, either join us and become a star or be a low-level congressman the rest of your career. Donald Trump may be forced by whoever to work with him or maybe they would have forced a contested convention on him if he didn’t agree.


29 posted on 03/22/2017 9:16:03 AM PDT by TakebackGOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child

Congress authorized Barack “Diamond Jim” Obama to write checks to the UN to “combat global warming in third world countries” in the amounts 500 million?
And all the other largesse Barry doled out with his US Treasury checkbook?
Then it would seem to me that we’re in trouble if congress is running things.


30 posted on 03/22/2017 9:19:56 AM PDT by tumblindice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: tumblindice

Obama himself made an interesting comment in an interview at the very end of his term in office. He was asked about the biggest positive and negative aspects of being president. For the negative side, he said something like: “You learn quickly that you’re really not in charge.”


31 posted on 03/22/2017 9:27:13 AM PDT by Alberta's Child (President Donald J. Trump ... Making America Great Again, 140 Characters at a Time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child

“Congress can override a veto.”

And considering the number of cucks in the GOP, that’s a definite possibility.
I was hoping Trump would be using the office as more of a `bully pulpit’ by this time. But here we are with him seeming to ignore little municipal gods and university administrators claiming “sanctuary status” while threatening legislators who question Obamacare II.

I’m not privy to his strategy sessions, of course, but it is discouraging to see what appears to be business as usual in Foggy Bottom and the president being coopted by that snake Ryan.


32 posted on 03/22/2017 9:28:26 AM PDT by tumblindice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: RedStateRocker

That’s all relevant but pretty much just constitutional obiter dictum.
I doubt if a lot of the movers-and-shakers in DC have even read the Federalist Papers, especially the left side (SEE: certain more outspoken members of the BCC) that couldn’t be bothered to read the act they passed in 2010.

Proof: http://www.leadinglawyers.com/helpdesk/us_constitution.htm

“The Constitution merely established the three branches; it did not set forth how powers would be divided beyond basic descriptions of each branch’s duties. For example, the notion that the U.S. Supreme Court’s role would be to pass constitutional judgment on laws passed by Congress is nowhere found in the Constitution. The practice instead arose primarily through the efforts of John Marshall, the fourth chief justice of the Supreme Court.”

For example, there was no discussion of the right of `judicial review’ of executive actions by the founders or mention of it in the Constitution. The Supreme Court claimed it in Marbury v. Madison and it was done. The decisions by the federal district courts setting aside President Trump’s EOs are illegitimate.

If war is the continuation of politics by other means, what we are seeing now? Either the last attempts of Uniparty to set aside the election or precursors to armed revolution. I received another box of ammo today.


33 posted on 03/22/2017 9:40:47 AM PDT by tumblindice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Arm_Bears

Republicans do not care who brought them to the dance, because we keep sending them to the dance, and regardless of what they do or do not do, we send them back to the dance.

Very sadly, Trump has no choice but to work with the piece of crap politicians that we have allowed to infest the place.


34 posted on 03/22/2017 9:41:30 AM PDT by chris37 (Donald J. Trump, Tom Brady, The Patriots... American Destiny!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

Ryancare is a RINO trap to undermine support for Trump. It sets up a showdown in 2020 just in time to cost him re-election.


35 posted on 03/22/2017 9:43:00 AM PDT by Lurkinanloomin (Natural Born Citizen Means Born Here Of Citizen Parents - Know Islam, No Peace -No Islam, Know Peace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child
The president can’t spend one penny of Federal money without Congressional authorization.

So all that Money Obama passed out was in the budget was it? Oh wait we didn't have a budget curtesy of Ryan and McConnell.

36 posted on 03/22/2017 9:55:25 AM PDT by itsahoot (Must learn to resist the compunction to offer advice or help to complainers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

Tell Ryan we want TERM LIMITS.


37 posted on 03/22/2017 9:58:24 AM PDT by New Jersey Realist (The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing. Edmund Burke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tumblindice

“I received another box of ammo today.”

Only one?

:-) We’re gonna need more than that I fear

I see it (the intent of the design) as the President having the ability to act swiftly when needed with the legislature being more reflective and to address issues in more depth. Again, just based on (my reading of) the Federalist papers. The ‘tiebreaker’ is the power to impeach.


38 posted on 03/22/2017 9:59:57 AM PDT by RedStateRocker (Nuke Mecca, deport all illegal aliens, abolish the IRS, DEA and ATF.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

Ryan is white Obama.


39 posted on 03/22/2017 10:00:00 AM PDT by FrankR (FULL REPEAL, OR NO DEAL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child; tumblindice
The president can’t pass a bill, but Congress can override a veto.

He doesn't need a bill he has an Executive Order, which apparently are harder to undo that amendments to the Constitution.

40 posted on 03/22/2017 10:00:58 AM PDT by itsahoot (Must learn to resist the compunction to offer advice or help to complainers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson