Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Bottom line. Rice denies being the one who unmasked Mike Flynn. That can be verified as there is a record of who asked for what to be unmasked.

So someone else in the Obama Whitehouse also was unmasking Trump campaign and transition officials. Who?

1 posted on 04/04/2017 9:55:07 PM PDT by Reverend Wright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last
To: Reverend Wright

Exactly. Rice admitted that she unmasked Trump campaign staffers but Mike Flynn wasn’t one of them. So this means that she is guilty of unmasking other people and somebody else unmasked Flynn. Keep talking, Susie.


2 posted on 04/04/2017 10:00:22 PM PDT by Helicondelta (Deplorable)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Reverend Wright

am i reading this right ?
if it’s masked, how did they know it was Flynn before it was unmasked ?
or did they find out after the unmask ?


3 posted on 04/04/2017 10:01:03 PM PDT by stylin19a (Terrorists - "just because you don't see them doesn't mean they aren't there")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Reverend Wright

Jeh Johnson?


4 posted on 04/04/2017 10:02:38 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (You cannot invade the mainland US. There'd be a rifle behind every blade of grass.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Reverend Wright

Did ValJar have a high security clearance? /rhet

She’s a real sweetheart....


5 posted on 04/04/2017 10:03:18 PM PDT by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Reverend Wright

It was all a conspiracy from the beginning..Obama and his cronies needed leverage just in case Trump became President..they were NOT going to allow this man to come in and wipe away their Commie agenda, he needed that to be stopped in anyway possible


7 posted on 04/04/2017 10:04:16 PM PDT by Sarah Barracuda
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Reverend Wright

Andrew McCarthy had a good piece on this...

http://www.nationalreview.com/article/446415/susan-rice-unmasking-trump-campaign-members-obama-administration-fbi-cia-nsa

“Consequently, if unmasking was relevant to the Russia investigation, it would have been done by those three agencies. And if it had been critical to know the identities of Americans caught up in other foreign intelligence efforts, the agencies that collect the information and conduct investigations would have unmasked it. Because they are the agencies that collect and refine intelligence “products” for the rest of the “intelligence community,” they are responsible for any unmasking; and they do it under “minimization” standards that FBI Director James Comey, in recent congressional testimony, described as “obsessive” in their determination to protect the identities and privacy of Americans.

Understand: There would have been no intelligence need for Susan Rice to ask for identities to be unmasked. If there had been a real need to reveal the identities — an intelligence need based on American interests — the unmasking would have been done by the investigating agencies.”


8 posted on 04/04/2017 10:07:44 PM PDT by digger48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Reverend Wright

Of course


10 posted on 04/04/2017 10:16:18 PM PDT by Williams (Stop tolerating the intolerant.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Reverend Wright

Right now, the speculation is centered on the Trump Team being the ones surveyed because Trump won the election.

It also seems that the surveillance of Team Trump was going on not long after Trump announced his candidacy and started rising in the polls.

As the tapestry continues to unravel, it is probable that all of the Republican candidates who showed any indication of possibly winning the nomination were also under surveillance.

This could be just the tip of the iceberg. Recall Maxine Waters claim of Obama having a HUGE database on EVERYONE.


11 posted on 04/04/2017 10:19:20 PM PDT by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Reverend Wright

Melanie Zimmerman and Adam Howsley both are also reporting that- it looks like rice is going to skate- Melanie claims the requests to unmask came from an intelligence agency- rice just acquiesced- Rice was a ‘consumer of intelligence’ and not the branch of intelligence itself- She couldn’t make the request herself apparently- but technically, she could’ legally’ request unmasking, and then the intelligence agency would comply and reveal the name- but it had to ‘go through proper channels first’ (ie the intelligence agency had to make a claim that it was necessary for the unmasking to happen- then the ambassador would make the formal request to unmask, then the agency would then unmask the people)

What Melanie and Adam are finding is not certain yet- but their sources- who i think are inside the agencies from the sounds of it, revealed that this was the procedure- We;ll see in the next few days how this plays out- but it looks like rice may not face any criminal charges even if it were a crime to unmask- There doesn’t appear to be any federal law that prevents unmasking- it may be unethical, but no real law prevents it apparently- Except —MAYBE— espionage laws- but that is a very thin line of prosecution that would have to prove intent- and as we’ve seen the FBI is loathe to convict a liberal on the basis of intent


15 posted on 04/04/2017 10:39:28 PM PDT by Bob434
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Reverend Wright

odumbi gonna be unmasking bubba in prison?


18 posted on 04/04/2017 10:53:42 PM PDT by TomasUSMC (FIGHT LIKE WW2, WIN LIKE WW2. FIGHT LIKE NAM, FINISH LIKE NAM.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Reverend Wright

Like all crimminal conspiracies, this one was planned and carried out by multiple parties with a crimminal intent. Each one of the acts taken in isolation can be argued to be nothing more than carelessness or poor judgement, and this is by design to give all the parties involved, plausable deniability. That`s why it`s important to point out the bigger picture, and the coordination between all parties. That`s where the true crimminality is revealed.

Susan Rice had her role to play, but ask yourself why she was even viewing masked transcripts involving the Trump team in the first place, when according to Nunes, the conversations themselves involveded nothing crimminal and didn`t involve Russia?

The answer seems to be that foreigners were specifically targeted for surveilence, not based on any legitimate crimminal suspicion of them, but based on their known contacts with members of the Trump team. Undoubtedly some weak justification was given for surveiling them, but the purpose was to spy on the members of the Trump team, with whom they were known to communicate.

Susan Rice must have been given the names of the foreigners who were being surveiled for this purpose or else, why would she even bother to ask that their U.S. contacts be unmasked when, according to Nunes the conversations themselves were not crimminal in nature?
Her job was to provide the justification, however tenuous, for unmasking these U.S. citizens who `coincidentaly` just happend to be Trump associates. This was a coordinated effort and could not have succeded otherwise.


21 posted on 04/04/2017 11:13:11 PM PDT by mbrfl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Reverend Wright

O Holy Be Bama. Touchéth not a hair on his head. He is the presence of purity and cannot be doubted.


22 posted on 04/04/2017 11:28:34 PM PDT by BigEdLB (To Dimwitocrats: We won. You lost. Get used to it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Reverend Wright

BUMP


26 posted on 04/04/2017 11:50:00 PM PDT by Freedom56v2 (Inside Every Liberal is a Totalitarian Screaming to Get Out - D. Horowitz)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Reverend Wright

Valerie Jarrett


29 posted on 04/05/2017 1:59:16 AM PDT by ballplayer (hvexx NKK c bmytit II iyijjhihhiyyiyiyi it iyiiy II i hi jiihi ty yhiiyihiijhijjyjiyjiiijyuiiijihyii)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All

this is just more proof that they had no idea that he would win..


32 posted on 04/05/2017 3:01:15 AM PDT by newnhdad (Our new motto: USA, it was fun while it lasted.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Reverend Wright

The real question is, Will the pubbies do any damned thing about this?
Probably not much. No cajone’s.
Gots to go along to get along cause they ALL be making money.


34 posted on 04/05/2017 3:37:09 AM PDT by Joe Boucher (President Trump makes obammy look like the punk he is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Reverend Wright

I suspect that this practice of doing whatever you want because you’re so arrogant and confident that you don’t imagine you’ll ever have to answer. This likely prevailed at the White House - The Culture of Corruption. They think nothing of it, plus they have the “press” to tamp down any objection.

If anyone thinks that Obama, ValJar and Hitlery weren’t right in there, they’re naive and blind.


35 posted on 04/05/2017 3:43:10 AM PDT by JudyinCanada
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Reverend Wright

Previously, Rice always reported directly to 0bama and Hillary before taking any action ...

Flashback: Susan Rice Explains Role In WH Decision-Making ‘People Know Not To Mess With Me’
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3541166/posts?page=1


36 posted on 04/05/2017 3:45:35 AM PDT by PIF (They came for me and mine ... now it is your turn ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Reverend Wright

Prediction: Susan Rice will be found dead - it will be a “suicide.”


38 posted on 04/05/2017 4:31:42 AM PDT by FroggyTheGremlim (Hillary Clinton: the official candidate of the National Sleep Foundation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Reverend Wright

They lie about everything else. There may not be a record of anything; it could have disappeared or they may have not done the required paperwork in the first place.


39 posted on 04/05/2017 4:38:02 AM PDT by MayflowerMadam ("To be angry about trifles is mean and childish; to rage and be furious is brutish" Spurgeon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson