Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: mazda77

nope- i didn’t say melissa said she woudl skate- I did say they are getting info from the intel community that she was asked to unmask by the intel units- so that means she won’t be the one to have ‘initiated the request to unmask’- the intel community will be-

[[When a political appointee with clearance asks for an unmasking, they have to be specific and it has to be a written request or an audit trail of request actions.]]

True- but when —they— are —asked— to do the unmasking, they do so based on the specific info they are handed-

[[It is a fact that in order for Rice to get anything unmasked, she would have to submit justification again in writing for each.]]

True- but again- she was acting- supposedly- on the request of others to do the unmasking- so that leaves her without the stink on her hands- technically

The way it works- on paper that is- is that the intel community ‘finds something suspicions’ and which ‘creates a need to have folks unmasked’ in order to ‘further understand the extent of involvement’ by individuals-

The intel community then goes to someone like rice and explains that they ‘need’ someone unmasked- she is supposed to —objectively— review the info and decide if it is warranted-

This whole process is subjective because there are no real laws that make it a felony to unmask people without solid reason to do so- there is only a subjective sense of right and wrong- which of course the left exploit and manipulate to their advantage-

[[So from what we are starting to learn, this thing was an orchestration involving many, many operatives inside the bubble.]]

And that’s the problem- pinning it on someone directly as the originator- —and— the other problem is that it’s not illegal —unless- they can make a case for espionage- but again we’re faced with the fact that there is too much subjective decision making to make a clean case for espionage- I think the espionage charge is more lenient- but still there must be proven collusion to wrongly expose those who are unmasked to violations of their constitutional rights-

[[Lots of canaries are already starting to sing.]]

I hope so- but again- it —might not matter— how much they sing if no actual laws wwere technically broken

We all know why the obama administration and why rice did what they did, the problem will be proving they broke the law tho0ugh- and provign that they were the ones who did so on their own


51 posted on 04/05/2017 6:06:35 AM PDT by Bob434
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]


To: Bob434

The “need” had to be specific and spelled out in writing to even apply for the justification, period. If it was given without this, which we can now assume it was, a long line of people are in serious trouble because of the sign-on and sign-off logs for the departments on the days it was done.


58 posted on 04/05/2017 7:06:57 AM PDT by mazda77
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson