To: lapsus calami
And in the Washington ComPost of all places - okay, what's the catch......Maybe the Clintons have become too big a liability to the Deep State.
5 posted on
10/24/2017 3:54:34 PM PDT by
dirtboy
To: dirtboy
“Maybe the Clintons have become too big a liability to the Deep State.”
Bingo. They’ve decided to take the risk that they can use the Clintons as a firebreak.
It will probably work for a while. The problem is, it will discredit them and their propaganda machine so badly, they’ll lose the power to control the news. And then they’ll lose the 2018 elections. And then they’ll lose the 2020 elections. And then they’ll lose the redistricting battles.
And at some point, all that losing will destroy the firebreak.
70 posted on
10/24/2017 4:18:33 PM PDT by
sourcery
(Non Aquiesco: "I do not consent" (Latin))
To: dirtboy
Call me crazy, but I've been expecting that after a number of players get their butts sufficiently covered, there would eventually be an unceremonious Harvey Weinstein-style toss under the bus for the Clintons. I've never viewed the Clintons as big-shot power brokers, just wannabee player, petty criminals who got big breaks to get installed into the sort of positions where they would be of use to REAL power brokers. They're greedy chumps who have been fronts and facilitators for real bigshots in exchange for a slice of the action. They're probably way too hot for further use and have little to offer anymore anyway, so their expendability is probably drawing nigh.
98 posted on
10/24/2017 4:32:53 PM PDT by
lapsus calami
(What's that stink? Code Pink ! ! And their buddy Murtha, too!)
To: dirtboy
Comes a time even the buzzards cannot stomach the stench and take a pass.
183 posted on
10/24/2017 7:39:35 PM PDT by
going hot
(happiness is a momma deuce)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson