Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ctdonath2
Doing 80 in a 30 thru a curve is plenty reason to derail.

But I'd expect the engine to have flipped over from the centrifugal force.

I do not see that in the pictures.

Look like it just went straight...

52 posted on 12/19/2017 5:13:20 AM PST by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]


To: Elsie

A full-weight engine doing 80 where it should be 30 could push right thru the track. That track is built mostly to hold the train from going _down_, not so much to force it to turn left. You’re looking at a horizontal force about 3x the expected load.

Yeah, maybe the track was weakened or obstructed at that point deliberately. Maybe it’s a freak coincidence that the train was going too fast as well (multiple unrelated causes sometimes, rarely, happen at once).

I’m of the Occam’s Razor persuasion: the simple explanation is usually right. If the train data recorder says it was doing 80 in a 30 turn, that’s the most likely reason it derailed.
I’m unpersuaded by small misunderstandings within the subsequent wreckage being indication of grand vicious conspiracies playing out when pretty much the same results would occur _without_ conspiracy.


63 posted on 12/19/2017 5:31:15 AM PST by ctdonath2 (It's not "white privilege", it's "Puritan work ethic". Behavior begets consequences.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]

To: Elsie

The lead engine is resting down on the highway.


138 posted on 12/19/2017 11:24:25 AM PST by pokerone (Live Free or Die is more than a catchy slogan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson