To: goldstategop
My idea is an attempt to split the difference:
1) Winning a state is worth 2 EV (for the Senate - a fixed amount)
2) The remaining EV's are allocated by vote percentage (for the variable portion of the EVs.
To: adingdangdoo
“... My idea is ... “
-
Glad you are not in charge.
21 posted on
02/21/2018 2:55:30 PM PST by
Repeal The 17th
(I was conceived in liberty, how about you?)
To: adingdangdoo
That works, but I’m partial to the EV by district, 2 to the overall popular vote winner in the state. If you look at the congressional races in recent years, or the red/blue map after the election it would make a strong argument that Obama would most likely have lost in 2012 and possibly in 2008.
28 posted on
02/21/2018 3:04:18 PM PST by
redangus
(actually hit her?)
To: adingdangdoo
Why?
Do you think you are smarter than the founders?
Or do you think the Constitution is a “Living and Breathing” document?
38 posted on
02/21/2018 3:20:21 PM PST by
SoConPubbie
(Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson