Replies

Did you wonder why Austria, Switzerland, Norway, and Iceland all stop the entry of immigrants. They stopped them from just walking on their country. They claim they have too many immigrants. So do we that we are limiting them by setting requirements to get into this country. Yet, the illegals from Mexico continue to cross. We can’t afford them, so we send them back as fast as we catch them. And they cross again. In Switzerland, they have helicopters with guns patrolling their borders. In the south, Mexico does to. And you mentioned a very important issue with the thought of receiving government benefits. If they can’t stay in their country, and they can’t afford to take care of themselves, why should I, and the rest of the people in the US called taxpayers, cover their bill? I didn’t birth them, why should I support them? No one here is made of money. If you can’t not be a burden where you are going, and they are stupid enough to support you with no real end of it in sight, then that is their fault, not the immigrant. And apparently those countries I mentioned look at it that way also. But it won’t be mine if I can stop it. I worked all my life to set myself up for retirement. Why should I set them up also? My kids are on their own doing their own lives. I don’t want to support any more.

Your objections to illegal and welfare immigration are valid, but why are you directing this at me? I never argued for welfare immigration, but simply posted an article about some people called Christians not being able to yet immigrate, and explained to you why they could not stay in Austria and work or obtain support while waiting.

But if you have a problem with people seeking freedom to worship and work rather than being persecuted, then we do have a problem, though unlike the Pilgrims and Puritans, the group at issue here are very much theologically perverse.