Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 04/20/2018 5:39:58 AM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Kaslin

When the dominoes start falling, it’s going to be quite a scene.


2 posted on 04/20/2018 5:43:13 AM PDT by ClearCase_guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All
About the author:

Marina Medvin is a criminal defense attorney recognized as one of Washington’s Best Lawyers by Washingtonian Magazine. Ms. Medvin’s courtroom experience ranges from murder to embezzlement, and includes all of the fraud and conspiracy charges in between. She represents clients investigated by the DOJ for election fraud and other white collar crimes. Marina Medvin’s clientele include an FBI 10 Most Wanted, WikiLeaks and Anonymous hacker activists, CEOs, lawyers, politicians, and law enforcement officers, amongst others.

3 posted on 04/20/2018 5:44:44 AM PDT by Kaslin (Politicians are not born; they are excreted -Civilibus nati sunt; sunt excernitur. (Cicero)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Meanwhile over at the Special Counsel and the USASDistrictNY, payments to the hooker AKA porno star Davis to keep quiet are considered campaign contributions beyond the limits.


4 posted on 04/20/2018 5:47:06 AM PDT by Mouton (The MSM is a clear and present danger to the republic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

This sounds delightful on the surface, but it basically says Obama donors got away with similar behavior on a much smaller scale.
Hillary, of course, has to put campaign fraud on steroids.


8 posted on 04/20/2018 5:51:09 AM PDT by GnuThere
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Which is why all those Clinton donors are investigating Trump. It isn’t to get anything on Trump, it’s to find and shred any documentation relating to the Clinton’s. They are burying the Clinton scandals and Mueller is providing the cover and time.


9 posted on 04/20/2018 5:51:15 AM PDT by EQAndyBuzz (What is a Blue City? First world cities run by third world politicians.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

That sounds rather similar to what Dinesh D’Souza was imprisoned for, albeit on a much smaller scale. Curious to see how far down/up the societal hierarchy our somewhat new dual-tiered system of justice extends.


10 posted on 04/20/2018 5:52:17 AM PDT by ManHunter (You can run, but you'll only die tired... Army snipers: Reach out and touch someone)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Hope the article is correct.
However, given the fact that virtually all of our government deep state marshmallow major types have managed to fail us (military excepted), I shall not hold my breath.


11 posted on 04/20/2018 5:52:45 AM PDT by Da Coyote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

I am a true “ Doubting Thomas”. I will only believe it when I see her actually going to jail. The clinton’s along with the obama’s and so many others have gotten away with so much for so long and continue to thumb their noses at our legal system while anyone else pays dearly for any infraction of the law.


18 posted on 04/20/2018 6:04:03 AM PDT by kagnew (WWW)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
There are over 1000 Democrat donors implicated, many with contributions totaling over $400,000. If the allegations are sustained, could contributing individuals, including the impressive list of celebrities like Steven Spielberg, Vera Wang, and Seth MacFarlane, be subject to criminal prosecution for their contributions? Technically, the answer is yes — if the government can prove that they were purposefully violating the law.

The government will not be able to prove a knowing violation of the law by the donors in the HRC case. What will have happened is that party fundraisers will have approached major donors, saying "I know you've maxed out on your donations to Hillary. But that's for her own campaign committee. You can legally contribute much more to independent party committees, which of course are all working "independently" for the common purpose. We've made it easy for you to max out on your global limit by attending this event. Don't worry; the lawyers have vetted this."

The donors will all have believed that they were acting within the law, because that's what they would have been told by senior party officials. The people who are in jeopardy are the fundraisers and party committee officials who were illegally coordinating their efforts. "Independent" committees have to jump through some hoops to maintain the fig leaf that they are independent as defined by law and regulation. If the government can prove that they were, in fact, centrally controlled and that their independent status was a fraud, then people can go to jail. Not the donors, but the instigators and managers of the scheme.

19 posted on 04/20/2018 6:06:54 AM PDT by sphinx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

This is how the democrats launder money when they steal from gov’t agencies too. The Swiss mountains are hollowed out to stash all the stolen money.


23 posted on 04/20/2018 6:21:08 AM PDT by minnesota_bound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Obama critic Dinesh D’Souza went to prison for a $20,000 campaign finance violation, but Hillary’s $84 million violation will not get her any time in prison.


24 posted on 04/20/2018 6:21:29 AM PDT by grundle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Nothing sticks to the Teflon Queen.


27 posted on 04/20/2018 7:37:01 AM PDT by bgill (CDC site, "We don't know how people are infected with Ebola.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All
The shrewdies running the Hillary Victory Fund (HVF) figured out these campaign mathematics, and in 2016 appeared to legally solicit up to $356,100 from Clinton’s supporters at extravagant fundraisers, such as a dinner at George Clooney’s house and a concert featuring Elton John. .....plus an impressive list of celebrities like Steven Spielberg, Vera Wang, and Seth MacFarlane......over 1000 Democrat donors implicated, many with individual contributions totaling over $400,000. Could contributing individuals, including be subject to criminal prosecution for their contributions? Technically, the answer is yes —

When the Clintons need money, Hollywood pulls out its checkbook Remember this?

HOLLYWOOD'S CERTIFIED DEMOCRAT DEGENERATES
FINANCED BILL CLINTON'S LEWINSKY SEX MESS

According to FEC Info, an Internet Web site (www.tray.com) that tracks federal political contributions, 176 individual donors actually contributed $10,000 or more to the lewinsky-era Clinton Legal Expense Trust fund through Dec 1999. Another 21 donors gave $10,000 in the first six months of 2000.

Thanks to Hollywood's generosity, a total of more than $2.2 million was raised in six months, which was notably more than was collected in funding during the previous four years of his presidency—combined. Hollywood producers and stars made up the bulk of the most generous givers. They included:

<><> Universal Studios tycoon Lew Wasserman and his wife, Edith, who have given $60,000;

<><>DreamWorks trio Steven Spielberg, David Geffen and Jeffrey Katzenberg, $20,000 each;

<><> producer Ron Burkle and his wife, Janet, $40,000;

<><> producers Peg and Bud Yorkin, $30,000;

<><> TV producer Norman Lear, $20,000.

Entertainment celebrities and executives giving $10,000 included:

<><> singers Tony Bennett and Barbra Streisand;

<><> actors Michael Douglas and Tom Hanks;

<><> director Ron Howard; producer Gail Zappa;

<><>Black Entertainment Television founder Robert L. Johnson.

========================================

How did the Hollywood elite list payments to Clinton's sex defense fund on their tax returns? How did publicly-traded companies list their donations on shareholder reports?

<><>How did the "DreamWorks" trio, Steven Spielberg, David Geffen and Jeffrey Katzenberg, list their 60,000 dollars to Clinton's sex defense fund?

<><>How did BET list its contribution to Clinton on its corporate statements?

<><> Did Harvey's company list these payments as "business expenses?"

The biggie is the tax element.

<><> Did Hollywood donors deduct it as a “business expense”,

<><> was it included in assets, payments listed on organization balance sheets as a "liability?"

<><> Did Clinton document it as "income"?

<><> Were the donors given a tax-free certificate from the Clinton Foundation?p....is that why they were so generous?

======================================

When Bill Clinton was at the height of the Monica Lewinsky sex scandal, Hollywood was by his side, offering donations for his legal fees, and one significant donor was a man who is now going through his own sex scandal—Harvey Weinstein.

Billionaire Harvey Weinstein raised $1,422,683 for federal candidates and political entities between 1990-2016. That’s small potatoes for his 27 years of rank Democratism, sucking up to feminism and upholding so-called abortion rights as he rampaged and assaulted young women. Adds up to about $5300 a year. Something tells me there are a lot of cash payments off-the-record being paid. (hat tip outpostinmass2) Crunching the numbers as outpost did does give us a sharper look at the political money game as played by the conniving Clintons.

Harvey also gave a bundle to the nefarious tax-exempt Clinton Foundation and perhaps to offshoots of the Clintons tax-free entities.

Did Harvey's donations to the C/F go to "do-good projects"? Or did they make a circuitous route? Maybe landing back into the Clintons eternal political scams?

28 posted on 04/20/2018 7:49:51 AM PDT by Liz ((Our side has 8 trillion bullets;the other side doesn't know which bathroom to use.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson