Posted on 05/03/2018 11:04:21 AM PDT by Simon Green
Democratic Rep. Eric Swalwell (Calif.) wrote an op-ed for USA Today calling for the government to ban and confiscate assault weapons across the United States.
In the article published Thursday, Swalwell argues that a measure similar to the 1994 federal assault weapons ban is not enough to combat gun violence, because it would only prevent new sales of assault weapons. He suggests the government should institute a buy-back program, which would take existing assault weapons out of possession. The congressman also advocates the prosecution of any individual who decides to keep their firearm.
"Reinstating the federal assault weapons ban that was in effect from 1994 to 2004 would prohibit manufacture and sales, but it would not affect weapons already possessed," Swalwell writes. "This would leave millions of assault weapons in our communities for decades to come."
"Instead," he continues, "we should ban possession of military-style semiautomatic assault weapons, we should buy back such weapons from all who choose to abide by the law, and we should criminally prosecute any who choose to defy it by keeping their weapons."
Swalwell notes that law enforcement officials and shooting clubs would be exempt.
Throughout his op-ed, Swalwell never defines what he considers a "military-style semiautomatic assault weapon." Instead, he classifies an assault weapon as a firearm that is capable of "spraying a crowd" with "lethal fire in seconds."
"An assault weapon, then, is a hand-held weapon of war, capable of spraying a crowd with more lethal fire in seconds," Swalwell writes.
"Assault weapon" is a political term that often refers to semi-automatic firearms with specific features and accessories.
Swalwell also discusses the February shooting at a high school in Parkland, Florida, admitting that he has used "moral equivalence" arguments regarding the Second Amendment.
"There's something new and different about the surviving Parkland high schoolers' demands," he writes. "They dismiss the moral equivalence we've made for far too long regarding the Second Amendment. I've been guilty of it myself, telling constituents and reporters that ‘we can protect the Second Amendment and protect lives.'"
"The Parkland teens have taught us there is no right more important than every student's right to come home after class," Swalwell adds. "The right to live is supreme over any other."
Swalwell also touts Australia's gun buy-back program, noting his proposed U.S. program would be more expensive.
"Based on manufacturing figures and other indirect data, there could be 15 million assault weapons out there," he says. "If we offer $200 to buy back each weapon—as many local governments have—then it would cost about $3 billion; at $1,000 each, the cost would be about $15 billion."
Swalwell says the price tag pales in comparison to the Republican tax reform law.
The day they come ...
Is the Day they were kept for.
54 I never thought of that! Too right mate!!
Except you forget - it won't be the BATFE, National Guard, sheriff's department, etc., knocking on your door - it will be a notice of asset seizure in the USPS from the IRS.
As we say in Texas, Eric “come and take it”.
We live in the age of 3D printing & tabletop CNC machine tooling that runs off software that you can use on a laptop we search Welrod pistol & Delisle carbine they are both 70 plus year old designs Just start thinking about targets that are strategic & not well protected
We live in the age of 3D printing & tabletop CNC machine tooling that runs off software that you can use on a laptop we search Welrod pistol & Delisle carbine they are both 70 plus year old designs Just start thinking about targets that are strategic & not well protected
Please, Eric. Come on over and start confiscating.
Yep.
5.56mm
NO!
Your move.
Samuel Whittemore is going to get up out of his grave, and kick this guy’s ass, and then shoot him - repeatedly.
http://www.badassoftheweek.com/whittemore.html (language alert...but how fine is it that such Americans lived!).
“An armed populace is the only thing standing between us and a tyranny that Democrats would inflict that would make the old Soviet Union seem libertarian by comparison.”
Now imagine how they’ll treat us if they succeed in disarming us.
Yeah, Stalin was a piker compared to the wet dreams of these would-be tyrants.
I’m going to have to watch that movie...for some pointers.
Oh, and re-read “Unintended Consequences.” Pigs gotta eat, ya know.
While that’s a nice graphic, it is woefully out of date.
Try 412 million - 660 million: http://weaponsman.com/?p=33875
Of course, this just makes your point, harder.
“We live in the age of 3D printing & tabletop CNC machine tooling that runs off software that you can use on a laptop we search Welrod pistol & Delisle carbine they are both 70 plus year old designs Just start thinking about targets that are strategic & not well protected”
Oh, they also have jigs and “paperweights” for .308 ARs, 1911s and 10-22s (the latter is out of stock for now, but available elsewhere).
Oh, and you can easily put together a really nifty, uh, “solvent trap” here: http://gunthreadadapters.com/ After all, you wouldn’t want to spill nasty solvent all over the place, that’s not environmentally friendly. Of course, you don’t want to get caught with any holes in the solvent trap that exactly match the diameter of whatever comes out of your barrel - that’d be illegal, and all of us are law-abiding...yessireeee.
These people have no clue whatsoever about the $hitstorm that will be coming their way if they try anything like this tyrannical, illegal and just plain STOOOOOOPID ploy to become our rulers.
Countermeasures, you say? At your service:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r6Eaqfi6gZg
Here’s a good formula: http://madogre.com/OldMadOgre/Interviews/myths_molotovs.htm
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.