Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: mrsmith
I just doubt this is intended for tourism alone. One of the complaints investors had about N.Korea was there isn't adequate infrastructure for business nor accommodations for workers/employees. So many wouldn't consider even when Kim had opened for business those few times prior. Also having enough N.Koreans with skill sets so weak you have to bring in outside people to manage etc. So this resort would be likely utilized for some CEOS etc. I can imagine..everything would be right there. P.S. Appreciate so much you link as I believe this project is significant to know of.
16 posted on 05/15/2018 9:14:43 PM PDT by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: caww; AmericanInTokyo

Well, it could just be Potemkin Village stuff, as AIT said.
The big news would be ‘who is paying for this?’. If NK, then Potemkin Village is very likely.


19 posted on 05/15/2018 9:20:48 PM PDT by mrsmith (Dumb sluts: Lifeblood of the Media, Backbone of the Democrat/RINO Party!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson